Page 10 of 12
Re: no bateman tonite
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 9:37 am
by Owd Codger
Mike wrote:DaveO wrote:Mike wrote:So keep Bateman and sell at least 50% of the key players in the squad?
Given it could be argued we only have very few key players in the squad of which Bateman is one how many would that be? One? Two?
I'd go for that top keep Bateman!
Bear in mind that a clique is just a group of friends. If something happened to one of your friends would you side with them, or whoever else was involved?
A clique is not just a group of friends. If there is a clique of players within the Wigan squad, we'd be better off without them.
I'm going for a clique of Lockers, Sam, Joel, Mossop, Faz, Micky Mac.
Lets can em all!
Does the same criteria apply to the clique on here?
Now that will ruffle a few feathers!
Re: no bateman tonite
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 10:15 am
by Caboosegg
even though everything is still just SPECULATION
it says something about people when the potentially are condoning
Edited by Mod just because they are brilliant player.
Re: no bateman tonite
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 10:34 am
by SJ
Edited by Mod
Re: no bateman tonite
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 11:55 am
by platt-warrior
Does the same criteria apply to the clique on here?
Now that will ruffle a few feathers!
Would you be more specific WW or is this another of your baseless statements.
Re: no bateman tonite
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 12:09 pm
by thegimble
Mike wrote:I also vote no clique. Just concerned colleagues.
I vote yes Clique no matter what work environment or sports team you will get cliques form. Human nature to get on with some better than others.
Re: no bateman tonite
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 12:42 pm
by TrueBlueWarrior
thegimble wrote:Mike wrote:I also vote no clique. Just concerned colleagues.
I vote yes Clique no matter what work environment or sports team you will get cliques form. Human nature to get on with some better than others.
Is that not just friends?
Re: no bateman tonite
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 4:37 pm
by Caboosegg
Edited by Mod
Re: no bateman tonite
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 4:59 pm
by Mike
Whelley Warrior wrote:Mike wrote:DaveO wrote:
Given it could be argued we only have very few key players in the squad of which Bateman is one how many would that be? One? Two?
I'd go for that top keep Bateman!
A clique is not just a group of friends. If there is a clique of players within the Wigan squad, we'd be better off without them.
I'm going for a clique of Lockers, Sam, Joel, Mossop, Faz, Micky Mac.
Lets can em all!
Does the same criteria apply to the clique on here?
Now that will ruffle a few feathers!
There isn't one.
Re: no bateman tonite
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 5:07 pm
by Mike
Reminder - no specific allegations on this thread.
If you write about something someone has done that turns out not to be true - that is libel and you can be taken to court.
Please don't post specific allegations on this forum.
Re: no bateman tonite
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 5:24 pm
by bill.inger
I'll be in a clique tonight with my mates in the pub.
There will be another clique on the next table.
They are all Sen Tellins supporters.
Our clique is better than theirs.