How to follow Toulouse game

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
widdenoldboy
Posts: 1857
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 10:25 pm

Re: How to follow Toulouse game

Post by widdenoldboy »

Maybe next week for O'Neil - was Powell injured v Toulouse or just rested after half-time?
morley pie eater
Posts: 3278
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 2:01 pm

Re: How to follow Toulouse game

Post by morley pie eater »

I wonder how big a part the psychology played in our performance (a "weak" opponent followed by our biggest challenge so far this season)?

Hope we give the right answer on Saturday.
Wigan ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Saints ⭐⭐⭐
josie andrews
Posts: 36134
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
Location: Wigan
Contact:

Re: How to follow Toulouse game

Post by josie andrews »

moto748 wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 4:37 pm I don't think so, but Shorrocks is surely more a 13 than a 9? We have a better dummy-half in O'Neill, hope he gets some game-time soon (probably not next week, though). JS is a useful utility, though, and the charge-down was a bit of a game-changer.
Definitely a 13!
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
No straw damn us
Posts: 2067
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 11:12 am

Re: How to follow Toulouse game

Post by No straw damn us »

Brennox7 wrote: Sun Mar 06, 2022 1:18 pm
Nezza Faz wrote: Sun Mar 06, 2022 12:55 pm And if Smith is able to come back after making a couple of errors, with his confidence low, and then gets the winner says a lot on his character, bounce-back ability.
He also got involved in a couple of our tries when he had the opportunity, whilst in the 1st half he was tied up in D with Toulouse controlling 80-odd % possession.
Not too bad a return for his first full match, in how long, as Lam never really got behind him.
The reason they had 80% possession is because of the errors Smith made, hense why he was tied down on D
No it wasn't, were you there?
Post Reply