WiganWarriorsFans.com

this means hes banned for the match vs us but not for the challenge cup vs bradford

02rinman posted:
this means hes banned for the match vs us but not for the challenge cup vs bradford

Oh boo!!!!

It was a bad challenge and he deserved to be sent off by Bentham (I think it was).

Should have got at least two.

turf posted:

02rinman posted:
this means hes banned for the match vs us but not for the challenge cup vs bradford

Oh boo!!!!

It was a bad challenge and he deserved to be sent off by Bentham (I think it was).

Should have got at least two.

He's already had a two-match ban this year; I thought they were supposed to take the previous record into account?

GeoffN posted:
He's already had a two-match ban this year; I thought they were supposed to take the previous record into account?

In that case GeoffN (and I haven't a clue so bare with me) he should have got more matches?????

turf posted:
so bare with me

You'll get arrested for going naked in public!

Note: a joke, please don't take seriously...

Fraggle posted:
You'll get arrested for going naked in public

Funny that one Fraggle!!!!

Seriously though, I didn't think I spelt the word wrong.

I can take jokes like that Fraggle, but anything under name calling, etc, I don't take very nicely to.

Think this is the 2nd topic on this.

I was going to raise that point Banksy after I went on the main web page for Wigan Warriors and then I came on here and saw this thread, I was like :conf: :conf: :conf:

This was actually posted 1 minute before the other one, but the Web Warriors gets more views.

You know when I listen, I get useful infomation on here.

I didn't know that this same post would get more views/replies than this one, even though it is in the main thread page.