Page 1 of 1
My Ratings
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:49 pm
by 02rinman
Pat Richards 6- okay attacking poor in defence
Mark Calderwood 7- solid attack but errors made
Phil Bailey 6- okay in defence and attack
David Vaealiki 7- my motm fort he was good
Liam Colborn 6- little contribution
Trent Barrett 6- very quiet not much impact
Thomas Leuluai 7- improved second half
Stuart Fielden 7- best forward by far
Mickey Higham 6- despite the try made a few errors
Feka Palea'aesina 6- wasnt on pitch for long sum impact
Gareth Hock 5- trerrible as usual
Bryan Fletcher 6- few costly errords trys to offload to much
Sean O'Loughlin 5- knock ons and possession given away
Paul Prescott 6- didnt see much of him all game
Harrison Hansen 7- did okay
Darrell Goulding 7- did well good try
Michael McIlorum 6- only played bout 15mins not much
Re: My Ratings
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:54 pm
by Mike
02rinman posted:
Pat Richards 6- okay attacking poor in defence
Mark Calderwood 7- solid attack but errors made
Phil Bailey 6- okay in defence and attack
David Vaealiki 7- my motm fort he was good
Liam Colborn 6- little contribution
Trent Barrett 6- very quiet not much impact
Thomas Leuluai 7- improved second half
Stuart Fielden 7- best forward by far
Mickey Higham 6- despite the try made a few errors
Feka Palea'aesina 6- wasnt on pitch for long sum impact
Gareth Hock 5- trerrible as usual
Bryan Fletcher 6- few costly errords trys to offload to much
Sean O'Loughlin 5- knock ons and possession given away
Paul Prescott 6- didnt see much of him all game
Harrison Hansen 7- did okay
Darrell Goulding 7- did well good try
Michael McIlorum 6- only played bout 15mins not much
Surely you mean:
Gareth Hock
1 - terrible as usual.
If he's terrible, why does he get 5? Oh I forgot, we're in the realm of GSCE scoring here where ou get 50% for turning up? Perhaps we are scoring from 5-15?
My average rating for this match was 3. And thats only because of the middle 20 mins of the 2nd half. Without that it would have been 1!
Re: My Ratings
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:57 pm
by Matthew
Did hock sign his name on the team sheet?
That's the only way I could give him a score of more than 1!
Nobody in the side deserves more than 5. For every good thing that they did; they would do something stupid.
At least it sorted one thing out - Richards shouldn't be our full back next season
Re: My Ratings
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 7:02 pm
by Haydock Warrior
Gareth Hock is good at two things
1. Dropping the ball
2. Arguing with the ref.
Re: My Ratings
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 7:03 pm
by Matthew
Calderwood didn't look as fast as he used to today. The length of the field try was good - but he wasn't that much faster than several of the catalan players
Re: My Ratings
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 7:05 pm
by - psycho -
i've been saying that for months matt.
i think the injury last season took it's told on him, he look's nowhere near as fast as he did at leeds.
his length of field try even looked sluggish. his running jsut doesn't look as smooth and free as it used to. penny reminds me of the old calderwood.
Re: My Ratings
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 7:06 pm
by The King
Matthew posted:
Calderwood didn't look as fast as he used to today. The length of the field try was good - but he wasn't that much faster than several of the catalan players
I have been saying this for 2 seasons. He is not that quick any more and is not that big. He also has no confidence and can only score if it is presented to him on a plate. He offers nothing, yes he may try hard but it is not enough.[/quote]