let lam go and keep pj and briscoe

[mario]

if lam is going to be out for 6 months or more then release him! dont keep him at the expense of johnson and briscoe

[johnsons_babexx]

To late now they have gone and i find it very unlikely they will be back me for 1 hopes they will especially pj but i cant see maurice going back on his plans. Hes already decided what he wants 2 decent players out and 2 crocked players in.

[warriors]

How about .......... NO. WE dont wont to release Lam. he is a wicked player.

But the other to are good aswell. so i dont really no what they should have done. :conf:

[ian.birchall]

Right on, excellent player but too old and crocked now, what has happened to the mean Wigan streak, we let Hanley, Gregory and Edwards go when they were a lot younger than Lammy.

[robjoenz]

I agree Mario. We are keeping Lam for at most one season, for half of which he is injured, that means we get a few months out of him. OK, we'd have preferred it Luke could have been his understudy for a little longer, but he's in at the deep end now and he'll learn to swin soon enough, by the end of the season Lam will be an extra in the squad, albeit a good extra to have.

PJ and Briscoe have years left and are both good players too, I can't see why we need to accomodate one player towards the end of his career when we could have had two decent players in/towards their prime

[the grinch]

we have loads of young guns in the team what the club is trying to do is get some experience and some youth together its not easy but hard choces have to be made!

[AJ]

another 6 months from lam, is better than six years of johnson, its that simple!

[robjoenz]

Whats to say that when Lam does get back he doesn't get injured again? Or if he will be back at all? How can six months of an injured player on the books be better than six months with two fit players? Especially if we are going to sell them to our opposition? Opposition are two men up, we are three men down.

[warriors]

He is trying to say that, Lam is better than Johnson, an he wud rather lose Johnson than Lam.
(Which they already have done)
Even thou he has got an injury for 6 months.

But i dont think that they should of let Brisco go. they should of kept him.

Then i dont really no which other player should have gone instead. :conf:

[warriors]

i am just sayin, but what about faz. he will be out for 4months? :doz: