let lam go and keep pj and briscoe

[warriors]

He is trying to say that, Lam is better than Johnson, an he wud rather lose Johnson than Lam.
(Which they already have done)
Even thou he has got an injury for 6 months.

But i dont think that they should of let Brisco go. they should of kept him.

Then i dont really no which other player should have gone instead. :conf:

[mario]

AJ posted:
another 6 months from lam, is better than six years of johnson, its that simple!

were not going to get another 6 months off lam if everything goes well, never mind if he has more problems! and as for faz being out for 4 months he's got a few years ahead of him when he gets back.