Page 1 of 3
Lockers: no case to answer
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 3:58 pm
by GeoffN
http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 30,00.html
Pleasantly surprised: everyone (except Ganson, of course) could see the tackle was only chest high, but nothing the RFL do would surprise me.
Re: Lockers: no case to answer
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 4:40 pm
by Susi
Nice to see some fairness,just typical Ganson trying spoil our chances.
Re: Lockers: no case to an...
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 5:41 pm
by wigan rugby
Very good news
Re: Lockers: no case to an...
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 6:25 pm
by jaws1
No case to answer but it could have cost us the match did he not kick the penalty from this????
Re: Lockers: no case to an...
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 6:44 pm
by turf
No case to answer, rightly so as well.
Ganson needs to learn head high from accross the chest.
Re: Lockers: no case to an...
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 7:49 pm
by medlocke
i don't think we would have missed him though
Re: Lockers: no case to an...
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 8:32 pm
by loyal
Course we would miss him.
Everybody who played against Bradford, we can't really play without in my opinion. They clearly played one of their best games (as a unit).. and without lockers i think we would lose a great defender and behind the scenes motivator.
And i know what ya all gona say.. It's Barrett that this and Barrett that does that!.
Lockers as also rescued us from many games, and he does do a lot more than fans give him credit for. He may not be the best captain in the world but oh well.. Thats what the name Barretts there for.
Re: Lockers: no case to an...
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 9:09 pm
by cpwigan
What annoys me is the bias.
John Kear screamed sending off
Justin Morgan on the BBC claimed awful tackle
What do they know
Re: Lockers: no case to an...
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 9:21 pm
by medlocke
loyal posted:
Course we would miss him.
Everybody who played against Bradford, we can't really play without in my opinion. They clearly played one of their best games (as a unit).. and without lockers i think we would lose a great defender and behind the scenes motivator.
And i know what ya all gona say.. It's Barrett that this and Barrett that does that!.
Lockers as also rescued us from many games, and he does do a lot more than fans give him credit for. He may not be the best captain in the world but oh well.. Thats what the name Barretts there for.
Lockers a motivator LMAO, youre haveing a laugh, all the guy does is tackle, his playmaking skills are non exsistant and his kigp are suspect at best, i think you have it the wrong way round, fans actualy give him more credit than he deserves. :sly:
Re: Lockers: no case to an...
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 9:23 pm
by botica
No Case to Answer? Mr Ganson has a case to answer. What would have happened has we lost 30-28? Would we have been moved on in to the next round? No!! He saw an oportunity and took it..
What annoys me is the bias.