WiganWarriorsFans.com

Both Fielden and Coley have had a 'no charge' decisions as penalty considered sufficient. But both will receive a letter regarding their tackling technique.

Fielden's letter will read:

"Don't shoulder charge someone once they have clearly passed the ball to someone else"

Matthew wrote:Fielden's letter will read:

"Don't shoulder charge someone once they have clearly passed the ball to someone else"

and Coleys will read:

'don't swing round their heads! it usually doesn't rub with the ref! usually resulting in penalties'

he winds me up with his high shot/penalty rate!

Didnt coleys hgih shot follow two blatent ones from leeds. We then get done for two in a row. (this will settle a argument between me and my dad)

However i though the ref was ok, did a few errors both ways.

None of Coley's high shots were as bad as the one from Bailey - which should have seen him leave the field

the only diffrence being we were told to be quiet for the cricket ,whilst the south stand were up to there screaming selfs ,bscked up by there sound system as any 1 ever seen a drummer or a trumpet player in the south stand at leeds????

pieaddict wrote:Didnt coleys hgih shot follow two blatent ones from leeds. We then get done for two in a row. (this will settle a argument between me and my dad)

However i though the ref was ok, did a few errors both ways.

he got one tackle before so he lost his head for a sec

cheers pedro

Bit of bad luck for us that Fielden has not got a ban for the rest of the season,i think Nobby would play him if he had one leg even though he is the least effective of all our props as it is.