53 tackles

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
Post Reply
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

53 tackles

Post by cpwigan »

Wigan had to make just 53 tackles tonight
User avatar
lucky 13
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 6:05 pm

Re: 53 tackles

Post by lucky 13 »

One sided game Hull poor or we made them look that way ?
or Noble gave them a bung :)
02/04/2010/
[IMG]http://i243.photobucket.com/albums/ff24 ... 10-1-1.jpg[/IMG]

HISTORY!!!!!!!!!!!!
butt monkey
Posts: 5416
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:38 pm

Re: 53 tackles

Post by butt monkey »

mickw wrote:
cpwigan wrote:Wigan had to make just 53 tackles tonight
so what.
Meant Wigan were not "stretched" defensively.

On the "flip side" it gave Wigan ample opportunity to practise moves.
[img]http://www.webdeveloper.com/animations/ ... monkey.gif[/img]

The biggest Room is the Room for improvement.

The best form of defence is attack!!

Out of the black and into the red, remember you don't get anything for two in a bed!!
ChrisA
Posts: 1696
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 3:36 am

Re: 53 tackles

Post by ChrisA »

mickw wrote:
cpwigan wrote:Wigan had to make just 53 tackles tonight
so what.
What sort of comment is that?

I find it astounding that a team has to make only 53 tackles in a game. Considering in some games 1 player can make around 40 tackles.
the-Bowtun-Warrior
Posts: 2815
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 6:13 pm

Re: 53 tackles

Post by the-Bowtun-Warrior »

hull fc were a joke.

Ok the players dont want any sort of knock before Wembley but last night was just pathetic!
Owen Coyles Super White Army!!!


CBWarrior
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:20 pm

Re: 53 tackles

Post by CBWarrior »

I think any team could have played hull fc tonight and not had many tackes to make, but I thought Wigan where out standing, up in the faces right from K/O and forcing errors.
ancientnloyal
Posts: 14389
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 10:33 pm
Location: Howe Bridge
Contact:

Re: 53 tackles

Post by ancientnloyal »

Although Hull, for obvious reasons, have Wembley on their minds it was a great performance against a profesisonal Hull outfit. Surprised to hear it was 53... at least 5 (10%) forced the opponents a few metres back in drives.




66 - 6

with our attacking, maybe 3 potential tries/ disallowed could have got close to the 80 mark.
https://www.ancientandloyal.com/

James Slevin
Ces Mountford
And the “kind of rugby player you’d want to be in your dreams” James Leytham
Should be in the Wigan Warriors Hall
Of Fame
Panchitta Marra
Posts: 6134
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:24 pm

Re: 53 tackles

Post by Panchitta Marra »

It was a performance against a professional Superleague team who played like conference team amateurs.
I am not taking much out of this game, solely because of the way Hull FC under performed.
XIII
Posts: 105
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 9:41 pm

Re: 53 tackles

Post by XIII »

We also only dropped the ball once, and that was when Joel Tomkins lost it when he had a try disallowed. Well done lads! :thum:
Wigan Till I Die!!

We've had Barrett and Kenny, Edwards and Hanley, Boston and 8 IN A ROW!!!
Kittwazzer
Posts: 11307
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:31 pm

Re: 53 tackles

Post by Kittwazzer »

Panchitta Marra wrote:It was a performance against a professional Superleague team who played like conference team amateurs.
I am not taking much out of this game, solely because of the way Hull FC under performed.
I am with you on this one. Rather than dwell on how well we played against Hull, I would rather know the reasons why we played so badly against Huddersfield, and get some reassurance that they have been addressed to everyone's satisfaction!
Post Reply