Page 1 of 1
Re: Englands 40 man squad leak...
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 9:34 pm
by medlocke
I know i might sound like a broken record, but why is Shockers on the list, he is out injured and has also been poor all season (apart from 30+ tackles a game) also why in the hell is Fatarseontheloo in the team, he isn't even from here, that is piss poor, an English player could be given that spot, here's one person who shall not be watching, the game is a farce, the powers that be have ruined the sport at club level and are now trying to do so at international level.
Bring back winter rugby and the biff, lets have some real men who at least competed with australia
Re: Englands 40 man squad leak...
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 10:24 pm
by cpwigan
Remember this is the 40, it gets reduced to 24. I think it shows how sadly lacking we are depth.
Re: Englands 40 man squad leak...
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 11:00 pm
by warrior till i die
S Briscoe, R Burrow, K Brown, T Clubb, M Diskin, P Deacon, G Ellis, P Fox, S Fielden, M Fa’assavalu, A Gardner, J Graham,
M Gleeson, L Gilmour, G Hock, J Jones-Buchanan, J Langley,
A Lynch, A Morley, D McGuire, L McCarthy-Scarsbrook, T Newton,
S O’Laughlin, L Pryce, J Peacock, R Purdham, G Raynor, J Roby,
L Smith, K Senior, M Shenton, K Sinfield, P Sykes, D Tickle,
J Westerman, D Washbrook, P Wellens, B Westwood, J Wilkin,
K Yeaman
Theres the players i would take
Burrow, ellis, fox, fielden, fasavalu, gardner, graham, gleeson, hock, buchanan, langley, morley, mcguire, newton, o'loughlin, pryce, peacock, raynor, roby, senior, sinfield, wilkin, wellens, yeaman
Stating 17 being
Wellens
Raynor
Senior
Gleeson
Gardner
Pryce
Burrow
Fielden
Newton
Morley
Peacock
Ellis
Sinfield
Hock
Graham
Roby
Fasavalu
Re: Englands 40 man squad leak...
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:23 am
by medlocke
pieater-alex wrote:Lockers is on because he has proven he can compete at international level. Always played well for GB.
Fa'asavalu although I don't agree with all this heritage stuff is on because he has proved a very useful asset to GB and is probably the best impact prop in super league maybe except Feka.
Sorry, but i could understand it was a player of a Faz, Rads or scully standard getting an automatic selection, but Lockers is just not to that standard, so what if he has played a few decent games for GB, he has been out injured and his form has been *****, it would be different if he hadn't been injured and was in some sort of form(though i would probably still be complaining), somebody else who has been playing a lot better could have had that place, as for Arse'avalu, he should be nowhere near the GB team, i don't care how they are justifying him playing, it is a disgrace, he is not British and has no British ancestry, he is in the side because he has been over here for a while, all that sort of thing has stopped within the league so why is Smith doing so, it is a joke and i hope we get taken to the cleaners, the Arse'avalu situation would have never of happened 15 year ago, we had sides back then that could mix it up with the Aussies, real rugby players, not sissy ass summer rugby players that can only just put one over France.
Please keep the language clean Medlocke - Fraggle
Re: Englands 40 man squad leak...
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:29 am
by mike binder
id still take fielden
Re: Englands 40 man squad leak...
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 4:43 pm
by the-Bowtun-Warrior
hock?
how does he deserve it?
no matter how much talent. he doesn't deserve it
Re: Englands 40 man squad leak...
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 7:04 pm
by mikey-warriors
look at the squad full out saints players and how old are most of them. they have done good to bring youngsters through.
Re: Englands 40 man squad leak...
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 6:53 pm
by viva_seddo13
when does the squad get reduced from 40 to 24 players