Re: Lee Smith

Got something to discuss about RL in general? Then this is the place to post it.
gpartin
Posts: 4706
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 3:37 pm

Re: Lee Smith

Post by gpartin »

JJ wrote:the RFL as charged smith with the kick.

Date 26/09/08

Incident considered Kicking out/strike on face in 10th minute.

Decision Charge

Details of Charge / Reason for NF Law:15.1(a)/(i) Detail: Kicking out / strike to face. Grade:C

Range of Recommended Sanctions in relation to Charged Grade* NFA-4

Date of Disciplinary Committee 30/09/08

It states that for a NFA-4 it recommends sending off sufficient (SOS)
how will they work this, as he was not sent off.
NFA-4 is a recommended range from no further action to maximum 4 match ban.
Gareth Thomas before his first game: "You wanna spend 10 mins getting smashed up by these guys..Big dudes here.."


Warrior10
Posts: 83
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:26 pm

Re: Lee Smith

Post by Warrior10 »

Lee Smith been cleared to play on saturday, fined £300. Now on rfl website!!!! Cant believe he's not been banned, although i expected him to get off, always same before big game!
gpartin
Posts: 4706
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 3:37 pm

Re: Lee Smith

Post by gpartin »

Warrior10 wrote:Lee Smith been cleared to play on saturday, fined £300. Now on rfl website!!!! Cant believe he's not been banned, although i expected him to get off, always same before big game!
£300??? ridiculous... he either meant it or didn't
Gareth Thomas before his first game: "You wanna spend 10 mins getting smashed up by these guys..Big dudes here.."


cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: Lee Smith

Post by cpwigan »

It is the usual. Finals or Internationals and no ban.
gpartin
Posts: 4706
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 3:37 pm

Re: Lee Smith

Post by gpartin »

cpwigan wrote:It is the usual. Finals or Internationals and no ban.
True it would have been easier to take if they had found him not guilty by falling for his pleas. But the fact they have said he is guilty and that kicking someone in the face is obviously not serious enough for a ban is an absolute joke. makes you wonder what a player would have to do to get a ban following a semi.
Gareth Thomas before his first game: "You wanna spend 10 mins getting smashed up by these guys..Big dudes here.."


cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: Lee Smith

Post by cpwigan »

Hock made the fundamental mistake of touching a referee. Had he broken another players jaw he would have been fine.
GeoffN
Posts: 12559
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 1:40 pm

Re: Lee Smith

Post by GeoffN »

cpwigan wrote:Hock made the fundamental mistake of touching a referee. Had he broken another players jaw he would have been fine.
He probably will, at some point.

What you no doubt meant to say was:
Had he played for Saints he would have been fine.
mike binder
Posts: 9763
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 6:17 pm

Re: Lee Smith

Post by mike binder »

and to make matters worse could be playing for us next season
mikebinderflooring@yahoo.co.uk for all your carpets and vinyls suppiled and fitted


TROPHIES COMING HOME
IT COMING HOME
ITS COMING HOME
ITS COMING
TROPHIES COMING HOME
gpartin
Posts: 4706
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 3:37 pm

Re: Lee Smith

Post by gpartin »

Nobby`s Girl wrote:
mike binder wrote:and to make matters worse could be playing for us next season
:eh: Enlighten us?
"Wigan are being linked with a move for Lee Smith – the Leeds winger who scored two tries against them at Headingley on Friday – as they look to replaced Liam Colbon and Mark Calderwood, who have been released."

http://www.wigantoday.net/warriors/Barr ... 4545126.jp
Gareth Thomas before his first game: "You wanna spend 10 mins getting smashed up by these guys..Big dudes here.."


DaveO
Posts: 16034
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 5:32 pm

Re: Lee Smith

Post by DaveO »

Well he made a pretty significant contribution to Leeds victory (MoM) so I wonder if the Saints fans lecturing us over on rlfans about our complaints are happy now?

Dave
Post Reply