NFA-4 is a recommended range from no further action to maximum 4 match ban.JJ wrote:the RFL as charged smith with the kick.
Date 26/09/08
Incident considered Kicking out/strike on face in 10th minute.
Decision Charge
Details of Charge / Reason for NF Law:15.1(a)/(i) Detail: Kicking out / strike to face. Grade:C
Range of Recommended Sanctions in relation to Charged Grade* NFA-4
Date of Disciplinary Committee 30/09/08
It states that for a NFA-4 it recommends sending off sufficient (SOS)
how will they work this, as he was not sent off.
Re: Lee Smith
Re: Lee Smith
Gareth Thomas before his first game: "You wanna spend 10 mins getting smashed up by these guys..Big dudes here.."
Re: Lee Smith
Lee Smith been cleared to play on saturday, fined £300. Now on rfl website!!!! Cant believe he's not been banned, although i expected him to get off, always same before big game!
Re: Lee Smith
£300??? ridiculous... he either meant it or didn'tWarrior10 wrote:Lee Smith been cleared to play on saturday, fined £300. Now on rfl website!!!! Cant believe he's not been banned, although i expected him to get off, always same before big game!
Gareth Thomas before his first game: "You wanna spend 10 mins getting smashed up by these guys..Big dudes here.."
Re: Lee Smith
It is the usual. Finals or Internationals and no ban.
Re: Lee Smith
True it would have been easier to take if they had found him not guilty by falling for his pleas. But the fact they have said he is guilty and that kicking someone in the face is obviously not serious enough for a ban is an absolute joke. makes you wonder what a player would have to do to get a ban following a semi.cpwigan wrote:It is the usual. Finals or Internationals and no ban.
Gareth Thomas before his first game: "You wanna spend 10 mins getting smashed up by these guys..Big dudes here.."
Re: Lee Smith
Hock made the fundamental mistake of touching a referee. Had he broken another players jaw he would have been fine.
Re: Lee Smith
He probably will, at some point.cpwigan wrote:Hock made the fundamental mistake of touching a referee. Had he broken another players jaw he would have been fine.
What you no doubt meant to say was:
Had he played for Saints he would have been fine.
-
- Posts: 9763
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 6:17 pm
Re: Lee Smith
and to make matters worse could be playing for us next season
mikebinderflooring@yahoo.co.uk for all your carpets and vinyls suppiled and fitted
TROPHIES COMING HOME
IT COMING HOME
ITS COMING HOME
ITS COMING
TROPHIES COMING HOME
TROPHIES COMING HOME
IT COMING HOME
ITS COMING HOME
ITS COMING
TROPHIES COMING HOME
Re: Lee Smith
"Wigan are being linked with a move for Lee Smith – the Leeds winger who scored two tries against them at Headingley on Friday – as they look to replaced Liam Colbon and Mark Calderwood, who have been released."Nobby`s Girl wrote::eh: Enlighten us?mike binder wrote:and to make matters worse could be playing for us next season
http://www.wigantoday.net/warriors/Barr ... 4545126.jp
Gareth Thomas before his first game: "You wanna spend 10 mins getting smashed up by these guys..Big dudes here.."
Re: Lee Smith
Well he made a pretty significant contribution to Leeds victory (MoM) so I wonder if the Saints fans lecturing us over on rlfans about our complaints are happy now?
Dave
Dave