Page 1 of 3
Gleeson in one word: Good or bad signing?
Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 9:51 pm
by ancientnloyal
Voting system is down at the moment. With Gleeson here is his signing in your eyes a positive one or negative one? One word only.
Re: Gleeson in one word: Good or bad signing?
Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 10:05 pm
by Mr Stu
good
Re: Gleeson in one word: Good or bad signing?
Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 10:19 pm
by ste lord
good
Re: Gleeson in one word: Good or bad signing?
Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 10:36 pm
by FROM A TO B
Bad.
Lost one of the best Full Backs in SL for an England Centre who can't score tries.
What a stupid thread :conf:
Re: Gleeson in one word: Good or bad signing?
Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 10:39 pm
by gpartin
Good
Re: Gleeson in one word: Good or bad signing?
Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 10:45 pm
by cherrywarrior
better-ish
Re: Gleeson in one word: Good or bad signing?
Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 10:49 pm
by cpwigan
Financial
Re: Gleeson in one word: Good or bad signing?
Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 11:13 pm
by THE 18th Man
FROM A TO B wrote:Bad.
Lost one of the best Full Backs in SL for an England Centre who can't score tries.
What a stupid thread :conf:
Good
Gleeson last season scored 11 trys to Richies 2 - iv'e stuck up for Mathers on this board for months but i would have Glessons record over Mathers any day of the week.
at least it isnt an Australian coming in
Re: Gleeson in one word: Good or bad signing?
Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 11:31 pm
by neilbass
Good
(great go forward / creativity & strong defence. I always defended Richie but enough chances given)
Re: Gleeson in one word: Good or bad signing?
Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 12:17 am
by josie andrews
How many bloody separate threads do we have to have on the subject of Gleeson