Reardon leaves wolves

ancientnloyal · Post by **ancientnloyal** » Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:50 pm

no wonder they got Mathers - news broke on bbc gmr i think, wolves have no statements.

cherrywarrior · Post by **cherrywarrior** » Fri Apr 10, 2009 12:21 am

Leon's going down!!!

GeoffN · Post by **GeoffN** » Fri Apr 10, 2009 12:25 am

ancientnloyal wrote:no wonder they got Mathers - news broke on bbc gmr i think, wolves have no statements.

Yep! Now lets see if Saints act as ethically as Wolves have. (and as HKR should have with Cockayne).

cherrywarrior · Post by **cherrywarrior** » Fri Apr 10, 2009 12:29 am

Saints acting effically???

GeoffN · Post by **GeoffN** » Fri Apr 10, 2009 12:53 am

cherrywarrior wrote:Saints acting effically???

Yeah, OK...silly me! I can dream, though, can't I?

slimshady · Post by **slimshady** » Fri Apr 10, 2009 12:46 pm

GeoffN wrote:
ancientnloyal wrote:no wonder they got Mathers - news broke on bbc gmr i think, wolves have no statements.
Yep! Now lets see if Saints act as ethically as Wolves have. (and as HKR should have with Cockayne).

If thats your view, ethically Feka should also be sacked!! Oh wait a minute he plays for us, he was provoked my mistake.

Matthew · Post by **Matthew** » Fri Apr 10, 2009 12:55 pm

slimshady wrote: If thats your view, ethically Feka should also be sacked!! Oh wait a minute he plays for us, he was provoked my mistake.

Had Feka forced entry in the blokes house and attacked him; then I would have no problem with the club sacking him. He got into a fight with a bloke who was deliberately winding him up in a public place - and who didn't want to press charges afterwards.

pryce and reardon forced entry into someone's house and then beat both occupants up - one of them a woman; presumably because the woman had divorced reardon.

You think that is the same thing???

cherrywarrior · Post by **cherrywarrior** » Fri Apr 10, 2009 2:00 pm

I cant believe my bad spelling above!!!! sorry!ps, Feka never got a custodial sentence, thats the only reason reardon has gone!

mike binder · Post by **mike binder** » Fri Apr 10, 2009 4:30 pm

because they know hes going down ,and sts dont want to admit that pryce will be serving a cusodial sentance soon

mike binder · Post by **mike binder** » Fri Apr 10, 2009 4:31 pm

Matthew wrote:
slimshady wrote: If thats your view, ethically Feka should also be sacked!! Oh wait a minute he plays for us, he was provoked my mistake.
Had Feka forced entry in the blokes house and attacked him; then I would have no problem with the club sacking him. He got into a fight with a bloke who was deliberately winding him up in a public place - and who didn't want to press charges afterwards.

pryce and reardon forced entry into someone's house and then beat both occupants up - one of them a woman; presumably because the woman had divorced reardon.

You think that is the same thing???

and its not pryces first offence

Reardon leaves wolves

Reardon leaves wolves

Re: Reardon leaves wolves

Re: Reardon leaves wolves

Re: Reardon leaves wolves

Re: Reardon leaves wolves

Re: Reardon leaves wolves

Re: Reardon leaves wolves

Re: Reardon leaves wolves

Re: Reardon leaves wolves

Re: Reardon leaves wolves