Page 1 of 2
Karl Pryce v Mark Flannagan
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:06 am
by dave t
Well I said it last week and I will say it again, why didn't we give Flannagan a chance at stand off against Catalans instead of Karl Pryce?
I am convinced he could be a future star in that position and yet again he has been ignored?
Re: Karl Pryce v Mark Flannagan
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:55 pm
by OAMJSONA
dave t wrote:Well I said it last week and I will say it again, why didn't we give Flannagan a chance at stand off against Catalans instead of Karl Pryce?
I am convinced he could be a future star in that position and yet again he has been ignored?
short answer
No bloody contest - he should stick to basketball ( Shaq)
Re: Karl Pryce v Mark Flannagan
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 5:03 pm
by LKC29
Pryce was woefull, he looked clueless, majority of the time he was wandering about keeping out of the way. What a waste of a substitute. Must seriously have to give Flanagan a look in now
Re: Karl Pryce v Mark Flannagan
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:38 pm
by the pieman
Is it me or does he look like he doesnt have the heart for the game
he is a man mountain and should be banging players left / right and centre
on Friday v le cats they played a physical game and he wasnt interested
Re: Karl Pryce v Mark Flannagan
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:51 pm
by cherrywarrior
Why should he care, he has his contract extension for next year!
Re: Karl Pryce v Mark Flannagan
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:40 pm
by TonyH
I wasn't at the game but when I saw the substitution Pryce for Riddell actually thought that maybe Pryce was going to move to centre, Goulding to the wing, Richards to full back and Phelpsy at 6, and Tommy to 9. Pryce had a half decent game against Quins but I don't think he has the heart, the size of the man he should be playing in the second row.
Re: Karl Pryce v Mark Flannagan
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:53 pm
by cpwigan
I daresay if Gleeson is fit the question will not arise as Goulding and Gleeson will probably be in the 17 before either. However, Flannagan is the better reserve of the 2 mentioned given his ability to play hooker, back row and stand off.
Pryce should actually play prop in the reserves to make him work hard for the 80 minutes. Do not substitute him.
Re: Karl Pryce v Mark Flannagan
Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 1:19 pm
by Lifetimer
Why don't we just get rid of the big lazy lump of lard.
I keep expecting him to wake up and wonder where he is!
I don't care what position he plays as long as it's at another club.
Re: Karl Pryce v Mark Flannagan
Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 2:20 pm
by GeoffN
Lifetimer wrote:Why don't we just get rid of the big lazy lump of lard.
I keep expecting him to wake up and wonder where he is!
I don't care what position he plays as long as it's at another club.
I rather like cp's idea of putting him in a position where he'll have to do some work. We need to get him fit somehow, since we've got him for another year now.
Re: Karl Pryce v Mark Flannagan
Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 9:58 pm
by old hooker
Why does it have to be Pryce v Flaganan?,Pryce is a centre or Winger,Flanagan a hooker or loose forward? so the comparison is totally irrelevant.