Cunningham joke?

Got something to discuss about RL in general? Then this is the place to post it.
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Cunningham joke?

Post by cpwigan »

http://www.sportinglife.com/rugbyleague ... inary.html

If I have read it right. No ban. The Wakey player suffers a fractured cheekbone. Yet less than a fortnight ago we were told that Howells ban was reduced because he did not cause an injury to Sam Tomkins.

We also have Richie Mathers up for possible suspension.

The disciplinary/judiciary really let RL down and it is probably the worst aspect of our sport.
User avatar
cherrywarrior
Posts: 988
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:03 am

Re: Cunningham joke?

Post by cherrywarrior »

Yeah but dont forget, fat man plays for Saints, they are above the law
Wish list: Billy Slater please!!!!!!!!
danny1978uk
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:04 am
Contact:

Re: Cunningham joke?

Post by danny1978uk »

Unbelievable!
Keep the Faith.......

My Better is Better than your Better
Matthew
Posts: 3273
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 2:40 pm
Contact:

Re: Cunningham joke?

Post by Matthew »

How is this any different to what Newton did to Long?

He should get the same ban.

Disgraceful
"And Martin Offiah, trying to make some space, now then..." - Ray French, Wembley 1994
------------------------------------------------
Interviewer: So that obviously means that you're not going to St Helens and you're not going to Leeds?

Frano: I don't know why I would ever want to go to St Helens or Leeds
------------------------------------------------
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: Cunningham joke?

Post by cpwigan »

It get's better;

http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1238
Player intentionally has a jab at the Wakefield player and as such is guilty of misconduct; however the Panel are giving him the benefit of the doubt that contact with the eye is accidental and as such consider that it is appropriate to deal with this matter by way of a caution
GeoffN
Posts: 12559
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 1:40 pm

Re: Cunningham joke?

Post by GeoffN »

cpwigan wrote:It get's better;

http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1238
Player intentionally has a jab at the Wakefield player and as such is guilty of misconduct; however the Panel are giving him the benefit of the doubt that contact with the eye is accidental and as such consider that it is appropriate to deal with this matter by way of a caution
So punching is OK as long as it's not deliberately at the eye? Disgraceful.
Pharabus
Posts: 108
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 11:01 pm

Re: Cunningham joke?

Post by Pharabus »

This opens up all sorts of possibilities, wonder what a punch to the nose is worth? If you punch to the eye but hit the nose is that a ban because you aimed for the eye even though you missed?

What a wierd ruling!!
pedro
Posts: 5294
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2004 9:37 pm

Re: Cunningham joke?

Post by pedro »

I cannot understand this at all makes no sense. Fielden got banned for raising a knee in the challenge which is a running style flaw yet a punch is a warning.
jackoh
Posts: 438
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 12:55 pm

Re: Cunningham joke?

Post by jackoh »

I`ve E mailed bootsnall and the RFL re this nonsense .
The RFL are not protecting players .
We have seen an increase in head high tackles and punching which is going unpunished . Smash someone in the eye causing a fractute you get nothing , yet if you touch a ref you get a 5 match ban . Unbelievable .
Who are these faceless unaccountable jokers , they don`t have the game at heart , and don`t realise what damage can be done to a player who has a short enough career as it is .
turf
Posts: 5539
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:53 pm

Re: Cunningham joke?

Post by turf »

It was an act of plain thuggery that the RFL have again ignored.
Post Reply