Page 1 of 4

Re: Karl Pryce

Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:16 am
by MrDave
Apparently Leigh have been after loaning Karl Pryce since the start of this season.


Re: Karl Pryce

Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 9:06 am
by Poster
he refused to go last time they enquired , perhaps because he is being 'hounded out he will go this time' although there is little time left this season and he is injured.

Re: Karl Pryce

Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 9:21 am
by highland convert
SA and KP on one year loans would make sense. Free up some space for the final years of the big signings,
Jim

Re: Karl Pryce

Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 9:29 am
by Panchitta Marra
highland convert wrote:SA and KP on one year loans would make sense. Free up some space for the final years of the big signings,
Jim
Not a bad suggestion Jim.
Couldnt see KP signing for Leigh with him having just signed a one year extension at Wigan.
He needs woken up from his hybernation.

Re: Karl Pryce

Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:58 pm
by Porksville
He should have gone out on loan at the start of this season to improve his fitness and get his confidence back. Whats the point sending him out now and whats the benefit from doing so in the final year of the contract and especially to Leigh. May as well send him to Miners

My feeling on him is that someone else will snap him up and get him conditioned to be the player he was at Bradford and it will come back to bite us (a bit like the difference you now see in Mathers at Warrington) We've had two years to sort him out and still he's a no where near fully fit.


Re: Karl Pryce

Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:40 pm
by wiggydoran
I think I am right in saying that players can not be loaned out now until next season. There is a deadline. IL said he wanted to send a few player out but the deadline came before they could do anything. I am not sure though.

I thought Widnes may want him for the rest of season due to Penny being called back to Wire.

Re: Karl Pryce

Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 6:33 pm
by jaws1
wiggydoran wrote:I think I am right in saying that players can not be loaned out now until next season. There is a deadline. IL said he wanted to send a few player out but the deadline came before they could do anything. I am not sure though.

I thought Widnes may want him for the rest of season due to Penny being called back to Wire.
Thought he said that if a player goes out on loan in the present set up he could not be called back for a month wheras under the dual registration next year he could play for Leigh one week and play for Wigan the next.

Re: Karl Pryce

Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 7:10 pm
by WESTCUMBRIARIVERSIDER
highland convert wrote:SA and KP on one year loans would make sense. Free up some space for the final years of the big signings,
Jim
why ainscough going anywhere, he should be getting first team rugby here, never mind salford leigh or anywhere else, if he wants to get him first team rugby play him insted of roberts.

Re: Karl Pryce

Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 9:03 am
by highland convert
Same could be said for Moore and Stains. SA needs first team rugby at a club that has no room for him in the first team. We want him back but if Salford can give him the time well done. We will get a better player back.
Jim

Re: Karl Pryce

Posted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 10:31 pm
by joeb
did you mean miners,home :lol: