Page 1 of 2

James Graham v Mick Potter

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:38 am
by slimshady
Heard a whisper that James Graham punched Mick Potter last week and that is the reason he didnt play at weekend, not injured as the club said. Been told he is on his way out and possibly going to Warrington.

Re: James Graham v Mick Potter

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:47 am
by pedro
No way on this earth could Wire afford him.

Is the reason Bibey left Wigan as he bench pressed Raper in a club :D

Re: James Graham v Mick Potter

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:50 pm
by thomo
would have him here like a shot - small contract next year then big money the following year to replace Fielden

Bet this is just pub talk about Graham & Potter - my mate knows the groundsman's cousins dog walker

Re: James Graham v Mick Potter

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 3:29 pm
by Panchitta Marra
Is Graham's shoulder still not iffy from the Buchanan tackle last week.
Surely that's why he was not selected to play against Les cats.

Re: James Graham v Mick Potter

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 3:39 pm
by MrDave
Graham had been training all week but was told he would have to wait till a day before the match for a final assessment as to whether he could play in the match but was told not to bother as he wouldn't be playing anyway.

On one hand you could say that Potter didn't want to risk Graham at all or you could say there is another reason behind it.

There have been a lot of rumours that Graham and a few other have not been getting on well with Potter.

I heard the other day that Graham could go to Hull KR or Huddersfield and then Wigan were going to trade a player + cash for Graham, a bit like the Higham transfer a few season ago but more wishful thinking than an a rumour really.

Re: James Graham v Mick Potter

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 3:46 pm
by Panchitta Marra
MrDave wrote:Graham had been training all week but was told he would have to wait till a day before the match for a final assessment as to whether he could play in the match but was told not to bother as he wouldn't be playing anyway.

On one hand you could say that Potter didn't want to risk Graham at all or you could say there is another reason behind it.

There have been a lot of rumours that Graham and a few other have not been getting on well with Potter.

I heard the other day that Graham could go to Hull KR or Huddersfield and then Wigan were going to trade a player + cash for Graham, a bit like the Higham transfer a few season ago but more wishful thinking than an a rumour really.
This is a must do signing if the lad does become availble.
Whether he would choose Wigan after playing from a kid at Stains is a different matter.

Re: James Graham v Mick Potter

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 4:09 pm
by right cross
ive heard cunningham had a bust up with potter and they don't speak :)

Re: James Graham v Mick Potter

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 6:07 pm
by outback wiganer
Personally I would love to punch both of them. James Graham because he is so arrogant, and Mick Potter just to knock some personality into him.

Re: James Graham v Mick Potter

Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2009 10:49 pm
by ian b
pedro wrote:No way on this earth could Wire afford him.

Is the reason Bibey left Wigan as he bench pressed Raper in a club :D
wire can buy anyone they want and still be under the cap :conf:

Re: James Graham v Mick Potter

Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 9:39 pm
by centralparkforever
Been told he has signed for us next season,Saints are skint and a big transfer fee has been agreed.