WiganWarriorsFans.com

So having a go at someone who has blatantly committed a professional foul and thereby prevented a team from scoring a match winning try is fine - but if you have a go at him for doing it then you have to be reviewed?

This is purely down to uncle fester whining to his mates in the post match interview - gutless

Let's see what happens to Buderus. I bet he gets a warning and fine, then again he might get the freedom of Red Hall!

just glad joel got off with a caution cos he should of walked. if ryan bailey had done that i think the crowd may of wanted his blood

cpwigan wrote:http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=2239

the player they have picked out from the photo is piggy but they have put tommy as the player in question !!!!

JJ wrote:Danny Buderus charged
Incident considered Dangerous throw in 30th minute (Prescott)
Decision Charge
Details of Charge / Reason for NF Law: 15.1(d) Detail: Dangerous throw Grade: A


Danny Mcguire not even cited :conf:

professional foul isnt bannable is it? Its not serious foul play

Correct. Professional foul is an automatic Sending Off. THEN it becomes bannable. But at that point, Alibert was trying to remember if he needed to call at Aldi before he set off for home!

ste lord wrote:

cpwigan wrote:http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=2239

the player they have picked out from the photo is piggy but they have put tommy as the player in question !!!!

I don't think they looked.... They listened to McClennan. If they had looked they would see a number 9 clearly on his back whilst he told the cheeting scum bag his parents were not married...

JJ wrote:Danny Mcguire not even cited :conf:

Mcquire 'cited' by a higher power
McGUIRE IN OP BLOW

Well given the serious nature of his injury and the fact that one of our players clearly took him out in back play I'm very surprised no one is before the panel for it.