Disiplinary

AdamMac · Post by **AdamMac** » Mon Jun 27, 2011 4:11 pm

How on earth Just LMS can get cited for a high shot in the wire v saints match is just beyond me. Bridge at one point put 3 or 4 high shots virtually every other tackle. Morley himself, westwood among others.

Makes it even more of a farce when you compare this to Tusons ban last week.

perplexed isn't the word...

http://www.sportinglife.com/rugbyleague ... inary.html

TrueBlueWarrior · Post by **TrueBlueWarrior** » Mon Jun 27, 2011 6:32 pm

AdamMac wrote:How on earth Just LMS can get cited for a high shot in the wire v saints match is just beyond me. Bridge at one point put 3 or 4 high shots virtually every other tackle. Morley himself, westwood among others.

Makes it even more of a farce when you compare this to Tusons ban last week.

perplexed isn't the word...

http://www.sportinglife.com/rugbyleague ... inary.html

More than agree!

gpartin · Post by **gpartin** » Mon Jun 27, 2011 8:24 pm

What about the fighting in the Leeds game with people running in from all over?

TrueBlueWarrior · Post by **TrueBlueWarrior** » Mon Jun 27, 2011 8:26 pm

The angel Raynor got a caution!

cpwigan · Post by **cpwigan** » Mon Jun 27, 2011 9:00 pm

Some very weird disciplinary decision. As per usual the Championship players got the rougher deal last week but Wire v Saints IMO Foster tackled King in the air which caused the injury and is far worse than these wrestling holds they are so obsessed with. Morley, went reckless at players early doors and one of the papers has a picture of Morley garotting Wellens which although amusing is far more dangerous than what is punished.

thomo · Post by **thomo** » Mon Jun 27, 2011 11:40 pm

morley put a huge high shot on someone - penalty only
not even a word form the ref

total joke.

you bet as soon as gaz hock blows on someone - he will be off for a few games rest

Disiplinary

Disiplinary

Re: Disiplinary

Re: Disiplinary

Re: Disiplinary

Re: Disiplinary

Re: Disiplinary