butt monkey wrote:TrueBlueWarrior]
BM, Wood and Cross are 2 totally different players and people, so Wes is entitled to have completely different views on them both, and agree with the signing of one and not the other.[/quote]
Did I say he didn't?
[quote= wrote:
Wood, who is nearly 30, is 2-3 years younger than Cross, played regular SL this year, missing 1 game if I am correct, unlike Cross and played some very good Rugby League this year in a top team again unlike Cross.
Is there a point to that? Wood will not play for us (if signed) and as such his form will be last years doh
TrueBlueWarrior]
The last point that Wes makes which you are questionning is referring to the squad this year and the signing of Cross this year, not next season which is when Wood would sign. With the prospect of Coley retiring, O'Carroll continually injured and the future of Fielden still in doubt (persisting knee injury maybe) then surely Wood could be a suitable addition. [/quote]
That is the point under conjecture
[quote= wrote:
Who has said Wood is surplus to requirements? Maybe they want to keep him or do you have contact with Tony Smith? By the way Waterhouse is a second rower and Wood is a front rower just for the record, replacement?, I don't think so.
CPWigan hinted that he was and "29wes28" commented on as a "great signing"!!!!!
TrueBlueWarrior]
Finally, it seems to me BM that all you do is try and ridicule posters opinions or views, for a reaction, and the post you supply to do this tends to have many flaws within it, as I have just shown you above. Maybe it is time you had a re-think before you post again.[/quote]
I don't need to ridicule anyone. People make themselves look ridiculous and child-like with their refusal to accept debate and resorting to name-calling as a last resort after being proved to be contradictory.
[quote= wrote:
Ps Sorry if I have stepped on your toes Wes (just needed to respond) but after reading many of your posts so far I am looking forward to your response to BM.
It is obvious you are "mates" good luck to the pair of you
You now have my response - go and play your angst records from N-Dubz before you reply and refrain from name calling if you want/desire respect from
anyone in future
Tut tut BM, you obviously didn't listen to my last post which advised you to think before posting.
Firstly, you clearly implied that Wes was wrong to say Wood would be a good signing when he had previously said Cross would not be a good signing. How you can say that is beyond me when as I have already explained they are 2 completely different players that would be signing at completely different times for completely different reasons, has that sunk in now?
Next, asking whether there was a point to my next quote is ridiculous, when the point I was trying to make was as clear as day and a 'monkey' would have clearly understood the point.
Are you going to be Wigan's new coach? Do you have an input on team selection? No, didn't think so, so how do you know Wood wouldn't play? If or when he signs for Wigan then the signature would have been obtained due to his current form (which is very good) and I along with many people, sorry all people except you of course, can not look into the future so you have to judge players on past and present, unfortunately.
The point of my post was regarding your response to Wes and the fact that he sees Wood as a good signing and Cross as not, and you decided to 'pick him up on that point' without any substance to your argument whatsoever (as usual). Wes thinks Cross would be a poor signing at this point and Wood would be a good addition in the off season, 2 totally different situations that you cannot compare BM, simple really.
When did CP hint he was surplus to requirements? I must have missed that! All he said was that a 'Wire player could be signing for Wigan'. A poster is allowed to say that somebody would be a 'good signing' or is that breaking a rule? or your rules?
Can you please quote me from the previous post I wrote, an example of me name calling please? Notice how you completely ignored the fact you got the positon of Waterhouse wrong and that he is not a replacement for Wood but probably Anderson due to him being a second rower, no response to that eh? The only person looking 'child like' is you, by simpling using the phrase 'doh' suggesting that I am stupid, when everybody who reads this thread will clearly see that the only person looking like an ass is the butt!
Everybody who agrees with each other concerning a thread are 'mates' are they? Must be alot of friendships on this forum then! Just for the record I have not got a clue who Wes is, just thought your post was ridiculous so I commented on that, so please don't feel intimidated that we are ganging up on you in any way, because we are not.
Finally the fact you know who 'N-Dubz' are and I don't again speaks volumes, now please listen to this advice this time around,
'think' before you reply because I am sure you don't want to look any more silly than you already do!
Ps
Refrain from name calling if you want/desire respect from anyone in future, maybe this advice is something you need to listen to yourself and not expect from others until you do it yourself.
'If you start listening to the fans it won't be long before you're sitting with them.' - Wayne Bennett
I'm usually accused of thinking too far outside the box so that's a first! 