Page 1 of 3

Salary Cap And Recruitment

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 5:25 pm
by shaunedwardsfanclub

On the face of it, we should have a substantial amount of cash available in 2012 for the recruitment of new players. This follows the loss of Gleeson, the impending departure of Hoffman and Coley and the possible retirement of Deacon. One could argue that we should be on the look out for four top quality replacements, but is that really the situation? I for one don't think so!

I would imagine that a large chunk, of the available salary cap, is already accounted for - incremental payments to several players e.g. the Tomkins brothers, improved terms for Carmont and a full years salary for Hock.

For these reasons, as well as player availability and exchange rates, I don't expect many additions to the squad and I certainly don't expect any stellar signings. That said, I have faith in IFL and the coaching staff and their recruitment process.

Re: Salary Cap And Recruitment

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 6:08 pm
by cpwigan
If the much of the extra is spent on increments/new contracts for younger players then that IMO is fine.

RE Big star names. I like the idea of taking the star for a season. So as an example, George leaves after 2012 and we take a Greg Inglis for a season etc. As a trophy winning club we have a lot to offer and if a season loan helps an NRL club ratain their star players then I am sure they would look at the long term gain etc.

Re: Salary Cap And Recruitment

Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 12:14 pm
by Dobby
cpwigan wrote:If the much of the extra is spent on increments/new contracts for younger players then that IMO is fine.

RE Big star names. I like the idea of taking the star for a season. So as an example, George leaves after 2012 and we take a Greg Inglis for a season etc. As a trophy winning club we have a lot to offer and if a season loan helps an NRL club ratain their star players then I am sure they would look at the long term gain etc.
I agree. There has been a huge shift in recent years at Wigan in terms of contract money redistribuution and I hope this continues as CP says with existing contracts being improved. The days of the likes of Barrett and Farrell, never mind very of overseas players like Vaeleki, taking up a huge slice of the salary cap are gone. There is a much more balanced approach now and the benefits to the team as a whole are obvious.

Re: Salary Cap And Recruitment

Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 1:56 pm
by Panchitta Marra
Salary Cap redistribution has to be a prime objective for Wigan Warriors. Top young player like Sam Tomkins & Josh Charnley, to use as examples, should be made to feel they are valued assets of the club instead of bringing in the big bucks signings from overseas.

Re: Salary Cap And Recruitment

Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:21 pm
by wall_of_voodoo
Panchitta Marra wrote:Salary Cap redistribution has to be a prime objective for Wigan Warriors. Top young player like Sam Tomkins & Josh Charnley, to use as examples, should be made to feel they are valued assets of the club instead of bringing in the big bucks signings from overseas.
Fully agreed

Perhaps a season or two of minor player replacement will happen but I cannot see wholesale changes to the team (including new coaches) like we used to see under Mo each close season

Re: Salary Cap And Recruitment

Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 2:59 am
by DaveO
Panchitta Marra wrote:Top young player like Sam Tomkins & Josh Charnley, to use as examples, should be made to feel they are valued assets of the club instead of bringing in the big bucks signings from overseas.
The two are not mutually exclusive options.

I am sure Sam and Josh do feel valued assets of the club and I am also sure we will sign marquee players from outside the club if they are available.

Unfortunately the Aussie increased salary cap and poor exchange rate v the Aussie dollar will make it harder to sign such players from overseas but I am sure if the club can manage it, it will do so. And quite right too. Lima, Hoffman and Finch contributed as much to the CC win as Sam and Josh.

There is a balance to be struck of home grown and imports and I don't think we have to worry IL is going to get it wrong.

Re: Salary Cap And Recruitment

Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 6:58 pm
by Panchitta Marra
DaveO wrote:
Panchitta Marra wrote:Top young player like Sam Tomkins & Josh Charnley, to use as examples, should be made to feel they are valued assets of the club instead of bringing in the big bucks signings from overseas.
The two are not mutually exclusive options.

I am sure Sam and Josh do feel valued assets of the club and I am also sure we will sign marquee players from outside the club if they are available.

Unfortunately the Aussie increased salary cap and poor exchange rate v the Aussie dollar will make it harder to sign such players from overseas but I am sure if the club can manage it, it will do so. And quite right too. Lima, Hoffman and Finch contributed as much to the CC win as Sam and Josh.

There is a balance to be struck of home grown and imports and I don't think we have to worry IL is going to get it wrong.
With reference to his salary in comparisson with more senior players would you say that Josh would feel a valued asset with the possible wages he is payed.

Re: Salary Cap And Recruitment

Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 7:15 pm
by cpwigan
Something telse me, Josh is not currently being paid that much.

Re: Salary Cap And Recruitment

Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 8:03 pm
by platt-warrior
God wrote:

Dont want Harris as number 2 but it looks like its a done deal IMO its not a good appointment and doesnt bring anything that Wigan dont already have. Infact we will be worse off.
Could you please explain God.

Re: Salary Cap And Recruitment

Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 10:10 pm
by No straw damn us
Wigan have taken up the one year option on Joe Mellors contract.