A site for fans of Wigan Warriors RLFC. News, views, statistics, profiles and more all contributed by supporters of Wigan RL.
https://www.wiganwarriorsfans.com/
No he was wrong!!Southern Softy wrote:Another match with no Thaler. Someone up there is seeing sense.
Wasn't it him who cocked up big-time in Widnes v Wakey?
Genuine question - I thought he gave Wakefield advantage after a Wakey knock-on and then failed to bring it back when the advantage was lost. Was he right in what he did?
On the refs twitter thing he said they missed the Sykes knock on. I'm not buying it, I think they forgot about the rule. One of those situations where video ref could have quickly pulled it up.TrueBlueWarrior wrote:No he was wrong!!Southern Softy wrote:Another match with no Thaler. Someone up there is seeing sense.
Wasn't it him who cocked up big-time in Widnes v Wakey?
Genuine question - I thought he gave Wakefield advantage after a Wakey knock-on and then failed to bring it back when the advantage was lost. Was he right in what he did?
It looks like they all had a go. Silverwood said something like 'yes the Wigan 1st try was a forward pas on reflection and there was also a forward pass in build up to Hull's 3rd try too.' I think that might have shut up the person who thinks that only one forward pass was missed in a whole Super League game. They miss loads...unfortunatelyKittwazzer wrote:Hicks was fielding questions on @RFLReferees today. I quite like the concept. No doubt football will copy it in 10 years time!
Unfortunately, Salford are not competitive, for a number of reasons, so they could have 20 on the field and and still get beatenWigan fan in Blackpool wrote:He'll have to make sure there are not 14 Salford players on the pitch at any time