The simple answer is ? / opinions please.

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
stegy
Posts: 97
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 7:52 pm

The simple answer is ? / opinions please.

Post by stegy »

Hi I am a season ticket holder at Wigan that travels for every home game from Accrington. In my opinion the play offs do not work they should be binned. Then we can get back to watching our best fit players in every game with the best team winning the league. I would also dump the Magic weekend it can be very unfair on fixtures. Increase the league to 20 with promotion and relegation. Finally I would like to see the season finish with a 3 game Lancs V Yorks.
Kaii
Posts: 1197
Joined: Sat Jun 22, 2013 7:43 pm

Re: The simple answer is ? / opinions please.

Post by Kaii »

There isn't enough decent sides to have a competitive 20 team league plus i really enjoy magic weekend so want that to stay :D
The grand final feels special compared to the league so i cant see many people wanting to dump it, plus it is a good way to promote the sport
Aaron C. Rescue
Posts: 430
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 8:43 pm

Re: The simple answer is ? / opinions please.

Post by Aaron C. Rescue »

stegy wrote:Hi I am a season ticket holder at Wigan that travels for every home game from Accrington. In my opinion the play offs do not work they should be binned. Then we can get back to watching our best fit players in every game with the best team winning the league. I would also dump the Magic weekend it can be very unfair on fixtures. Increase the league to 20 with promotion and relegation. Finally I would like to see the season finish with a 3 game Lancs V Yorks.




Lancs v Yorks wont work, no real 'intensity' between the players, it cant come anywhere near SOO.
"Are you a jew by any chance ?", "No, a tree fell on me"


'I was certain, positive, convinced, and yet...unsure'


'It's only rock 'n' roll, but I like it'
thegimble
Posts: 5901
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 10:09 am

Re: The simple answer is ? / opinions please.

Post by thegimble »

Mid season games that are meaningless needs to be stopped. Either start the season a week later or after Easter Monday give the players a week off. So they get a break from Easter Monday and do not play for 10 days.
markill
Posts: 3675
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 4:50 pm
Contact:

Re: The simple answer is ? / opinions please.

Post by markill »

stegy wrote:Hi I am a season ticket holder at Wigan that travels for every home game from Accrington. In my opinion the play offs do not work they should be binned. Then we can get back to watching our best fit players in every game with the best team winning the league. I would also dump the Magic weekend it can be very unfair on fixtures. Increase the league to 20 with promotion and relegation. Finally I would like to see the season finish with a 3 game Lancs V Yorks.
No. In my opinion that is all wrong. 20 teams is too many, way way too many. Magic is fine, its only 'unfair' on fixtures because there are too many poor teams in the division. Sort that out and it would be fine. The playoffs do work, but it should be incentivised greater to do well in the league by having fewer teams play in them - over half the league in a very to heavy league is the issue, not playoffs themselves.

A Lancs v Yorks series that they could get popular and important would be great, but not at the end of the season - you really don't want all your international players beating each other up immediately before an international series.
in the world of mules, there are no rules

LATEST PODCAST EPISODE
https://www.spreaker.com/user/superleaguepod
TonyH
Posts: 1024
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 11:22 am

Re: The simple answer is ? / opinions please.

Post by TonyH »

The team that finishes first should go straight to the Grand Final and teams 2-5 should battle it out to get to Old Trafford. That's how you get intensity in nearly every game, reduce the amount of Playoff places and make coming first actually mean something.
Up The Mont!
devon jim 1
Posts: 449
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 5:53 pm

Re: The simple answer is ? / opinions please.

Post by devon jim 1 »

Toney H I agree But (there is always a BUT). Just get bout the play offs re instate the old league championship re instate the Premier ship. Easy.( I have some great ideas when I'm drunk. :D The RFL should get drunk before they inflict theier ideas on us. WHAT? you say. Thry are drunk :exc: :exc:
LORENZO
Posts: 412
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 11:26 am

Re: The simple answer is ? / opinions please.

Post by LORENZO »

Agree that we should re-instate top 4 play off only.
When the number of teams is reduced to 12 why not kick-off the season with a floodlit trophy comp or similar.
3 groups of 4 or 4groups of 3 playing home and away with the winners going into the play-off and final. If it is four teams of three the team second with the highest number of points for goes through.

Will get around all these early season games that count for little and, assuming that the prize is big enough, all the teams will need to hit the ground running.
Of course, the alternative would be returning the Challenge cup to May with the comp starting earlier.
DaveO
Posts: 15910
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 5:32 pm

Re: The simple answer is ? / opinions please.

Post by DaveO »

markill wrote:Magic is fine, its only 'unfair' on fixtures because there are too many poor teams in the division. Sort that out and it would be fine.
It's impossible to sort out because we are never going to get teams of equal capability. Some teams will at some stage always be the stand out team(s). If we must have a day out like this make it a CC round. Then the luck of the draw is expected if you see what I mean.

Magic is a perfect example of RFL incompetence because just how much effort do they put into promoting this when the International game is crying out for its status to be boosted with the fans here? They are promoting the league when they should be promoting the International game. Those who go seem to like it as a day out but it is very poorly attended so it doesn't even work from that point of view and now the novelty has worn off doesn't even get a great deal of media coverage.
The playoffs do work, but it should be incentivised greater to do well in the league by having fewer teams play in them - over half the league in a very to heavy league is the issue, not playoffs themselves.
What do you mean by saying "The playoffs do work..."? What are they trying to achieve?

Deliver the best team as champions (does not do this IMO) or are you referring to extending the season or some other objective?

markill
Posts: 3675
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 4:50 pm
Contact:

Re: The simple answer is ? / opinions please.

Post by markill »

The playoffs ensure an exciting end to the season with a big show piece event, which in itself gives the game a good deal of exposure and makes money. I think the best team does end up winning, just what makes then the 'best' isn't what ordinarily we attribute this title too - i.e. the team that most consistently can beat all opponents - we get the team that can consistently win the bigger games against the better opponents.

I think we had a similar debate about the playoffs around the end of last season / off-season though Dave, so we're never going to agree. I like the 'American' model of leagues and not the 'European' model.

What we should agree on is all of these things would work out just fine if the league found a way to make more teams equally competitive without substantially reducing the quality. I think the NFL model is the most successful at doing that, and we've moved away from it. the NRL is more similar to it and is flourishing.
in the world of mules, there are no rules

LATEST PODCAST EPISODE
https://www.spreaker.com/user/superleaguepod
Post Reply