Thomas Burgess

up the junction · Post by **up the junction** » Sat Nov 02, 2013 4:12 pm

Poor poor poor really needs dropping ,too many mistakes for this level of rugby.

Kittwazzer · Post by **Kittwazzer** » Sat Nov 02, 2013 4:22 pm

up the junction wrote:Poor poor poor really needs dropping ,too many mistakes for this level of rugby.

Couldnt agree more. How bad can Luke be if Tom is better?

Or is Bananaman pitching for a nice little number off Mr Crowe?

cpwigan · Post by **cpwigan** » Sat Nov 02, 2013 5:47 pm

He has potential but he still needs to develop considerably.

Kittwazzer · Post by **Kittwazzer** » Sat Nov 02, 2013 5:50 pm

cpwigan wrote:He has potential but he still needs to develop considerably.

Yes, but the World Cup is hardly the place to develop him!

cpwigan · Post by **cpwigan** » Sat Nov 02, 2013 6:30 pm

Kittwazzer wrote:
cpwigan wrote:He has potential but he still needs to develop considerably.
Yes, but the World Cup is hardly the place to develop him!

Totally agree KW, Big Earl was a better selection IMO and Mossop is also a better prop.

Kittwazzer · Post by **Kittwazzer** » Sat Nov 02, 2013 7:03 pm

cpwigan wrote:
Kittwazzer wrote:
cpwigan wrote:He has potential but he still needs to develop considerably.
Yes, but the World Cup is hardly the place to develop him!
Totally agree KW, Big Earl was a better selection IMO and Mossop is also a better prop.

Correct, and what makes it worse is the fact that his twin brother is so noticeably a better player, they are bound to be compared. McNamara must surely see this. Question is, has he got the nous or the bottle to drop him. He's played in both games now and been found lacking!

Kaii · Post by **Kaii** » Sat Nov 02, 2013 8:35 pm

The Burgess brothers are there for the publicity, imo only George is good enough for his England spot. People can bring up NRL stats but this isn't the NRL.

up the junction · Post by **up the junction** » Sun Nov 03, 2013 9:27 am

Kaii wrote: The Burgess brothers are there for the publicity, imo only George is good enough for his England spot. People can bring up NRL stats but this isn't the NRL.

Sam's a great player also ,his around game imo is the better of the four by a mile,but I think he should probably be playing
prop or second row leaving 13 free for Lockers .

cpwigan · Post by **cpwigan** » Sun Nov 03, 2013 9:58 am

The Burgess brothers are very good to outstanding players. Sam and George are very destructive players.

I too prefer the idea of Sam having stints at prop / second row for England.

jasonnlouise · Post by **jasonnlouise** » Sun Nov 03, 2013 12:28 pm

made far too many mistakes yesterday,Mossop was dropped for less,keep Graham in Lockers at 13 and Sam B in front/second row spot

Thomas Burgess

Thomas Burgess

Re: Thomas Burgess

Re: Thomas Burgess

Re: Thomas Burgess

Re: Thomas Burgess

Re: Thomas Burgess

Re: Thomas Burgess

Re: Thomas Burgess

Re: Thomas Burgess

Re: Thomas Burgess