Page 1 of 3
Re: Betts
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 8:57 pm
by mrs_carney
I'm pretty sure betts gives them what for at half time and he certainly doesnt hold back if they lose, so i doubt thats the problem. If you look at the team now he has hardly been on the same team as some of them.
Re: Betts
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 10:45 pm
by Exiled Wiganer
There might be something in it. He could do with a mentor to whom he can turn though. He deserves massive credit for the grace he is showing under fire. He got the job through Mike G's illness, and we can all see the calibre of squad he has been given to work with.
Re: Betts
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 10:48 pm
by mrs_carney
farrar?
Re: Betts
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 10:49 pm
by mike binder
isnt that war farrahs there 4
Re: Betts
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 11:55 am
by we_need_a_coach
mrs_carney posted:
I'm pretty sure betts gives them what for at half time and he certainly doesnt hold back if they lose, so i doubt thats the problem. If you look at the team now he has hardly been on the same team as some of them.

You are far to loyal, Betts is the coach, therefore it's down to him to motivate and dictate tactics, he does neither, get shut.
We need a coach.
Re: Betts
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 1:53 pm
by thegimble
we_need_a_coach posted:
mrs_carney posted:
I'm pretty sure betts gives them what for at half time and he certainly doesnt hold back if they lose, so i doubt thats the problem. If you look at the team now he has hardly been on the same team as some of them.

You are far to loyal, Betts is the coach, therefore it's down to him to motivate and dictate tactics, he does neither, get shut.
We need a coach.
So when we beat the Saints and Hull was this not down to Betts tactics or was it down to the players.
If it was the players then is it not them that lost to Leeds as well, or do you like a poloitician use only facts that suites yourself.
Re: Betts
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 1:56 pm
by Wardy
Yeah, when i heard we were gettin farrar i thought that he would be above betts as a voice of experience with betts doin the day 2 day running etc. but when announced he would be betts understudy .. slight insult to him!! We need farrar to come forward & help betts drag this team where it belongs to be!!!
Re: Betts
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 7:37 pm
by mike binder
said it before watch the young lads u 11 u 12 u13 u14 at weekends im sure ive said this b4 as long as the scouts get out there the future is bright the future IS cherry and white
Re: Betts
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 7:48 pm
by Red Hot Mama
as long as the scouts get out there the future is bright the future IS cherry and white
Do you know about the Wigan scouts? They only look at lads in the Wigan Area. They have missed out on a load of extremely talented players from just outside the wigan territory because they are so blinkered they only look at a couple of well known clubs. This is a sad loss to the Wigan future
Re: Betts
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 8:03 pm
by mike binder
Red Hot Mama posted:
as long as the scouts get out there the future is bright the future IS cherry and white
Do you know about the Wigan scouts? They only look at lads in the Wigan Area. They have missed out on a load of extremely talented players from just outside the wigan territory because they are so blinkered they only look at a couple of well known clubs. This is a sad loss to the Wigan future
it sure is i follow st judes all over nw area st helens widnes oldham etc and beleive me there is some talent out there