Page 1 of 4
Re: Scully to face disciplanar...
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 5:09 pm
by mrs_carney
I can see millward going for the same team, although if scully is banned i can see him using prescott instead of Mcdonald.
Re: Scully to face discipl...
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 5:52 pm
by HappyHooker
I agree, don't think he's macdonalds #1 fan somehow! Does anybody know how heavy Prescott is? - different sources give different weights, and he seems quite big. Yet official website puts him at 5kgs lighter than Terry. Not right big for a prop...
Re: Scully to face discipl...
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 5:55 pm
by mrs_carney
I think everybody gets the feeling he's not Mcdonalds #1 fan. I'd imagine the official site to be right, he's smaller than hargreaves i think and i cant remember him being overly big as props go, but then again he is only young.
Re: Scully to face discipl...
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 6:05 pm
by warrior till i die
i thaught hargreaves done well when he was on the pitch yesterday made some good yards and a good few offloads. Why not give him ago? Also Its a bit unfair on scully thats how he runs he didnt have intent in that. Why didnt they put andy coley on report for a swinging arm on scully after that incident?
Re: Scully to face discipl...
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 6:09 pm
by mike binder
warrior till i die posted:
i thaught hargreaves done well when he was on the pitch yesterday made some good yards and a good few offloads. Why not give him ago? Also Its a bit unfair on scully thats how he runs he didnt have intent in that. Why didnt they put andy coley on report for a swinging arm on scully after that incident?
because he dosnt play 4 wigan :exc: :eh: :sly:
Re: Scully to face discipl...
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 6:10 pm
by mrs_carney
Hargreaves probably will get another go, but we need another prop if scully gets banned and i reckon he'll choose prescott over McDonald. I didn't think his run was done with intent and if you watch the video the guy didn't move his head right for the tackle so scully isn't entirely to blame but i reckon we could lose him for a match. Andy Coley doesn't play for wigan so its alright for him to do whatever he wants.
Re: Scully to face discipl...
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 6:17 pm
by mike binder
mrs_carney posted:
Hargreaves probably will get another go, but we need another prop if scully gets banned and i reckon he'll choose prescott over McDonald. I didn't think his run was done with intent and if you watch the video the guy didn't move his head right for the tackle so scully isn't entirely to blame but i reckon we could lose him for a match. Andy Coley doesn't play for wigan so its alright for him to do whatever he wants.
didnt i say that
Re: Scully to face discipl...
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 6:21 pm
by mrs_carney
Not all of it and i was typing my message when you posted it, so i didnt see the last bit. But its good to see someone agrees with me
Re: Scully to face discipl...
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 6:22 pm
by mike binder
Re: Scully to face discipl...
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 6:38 pm
by wiresphs
mike binder posted:
warrior till i die posted:
i thaught hargreaves done well when he was on the pitch yesterday made some good yards and a good few offloads. Why not give him ago? Also Its a bit unfair on scully thats how he runs he didnt have intent in that. Why didnt they put andy coley on report for a swinging arm on scully after that incident?
because he dosnt play 4 wigan :exc: :eh: :sly:

"Oh SHOCK"! The auld, "Wigan being hard done to by the ref", thread again hey! It really does become a little tedious, dont you think? It wont be long before every ref in SL will be responsible for your lowly position in the league, will it? Get it in to your heads that "EVERY" team in SL suffers from questionable decisions by the merry whistle-blowers,"NOT JUST WIGAN"! The sooner your players learn to stop winging every-time they feel hard done to, get on with it and concentrate on their own game, then the sooner they may start to climb the table! (Youre beginning to sound like Bradford)!