Page 1 of 3
sallary cap
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:23 pm
by mike binder
heard a little wisper that the rfl are getting a little worried because leeds and wigan are getting ready to challenge the rule in the courts as a restrant of buisness and the legalality of the rules just a little wisper dont kno any more
Re: sallary cap
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:52 pm
by mrs_carney
from your good friend ian?
Re: sallary cap
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:54 pm
by davewarrior
:eusa4: lets not keep going on about the salary cap. The only thing wrong with it is the fact in the past our club has miss managed it
Re: sallary cap
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 6:09 pm
by DaveO
davewarrior posted:
:eusa4: lets not keep going on about the salary cap. The only thing wrong with it is the fact in the past our club has miss managed it
Well it's not perfect that is for sure but I doubt Leeds will be involved in challenging it. It was Hethrington at Leeds who was the chief architect of the current flat rate cap and was instrumental in having it set at 1.8 million quid when smaller clubs wanted it at 1.3 million.
Coincidentally with the cap at 1.8 million Leeds didn't have to shed any players or require a dispensation for a season to honour current contracts as Wigan did.
He said himself at the time only one club would be affected so he is pretty wedded to the idea of the salary cap if oyu ask me.
If you listen to ML so is he up to a point. What he doesn't like is the 20/20 so maybe that is the issue to be challenged.
Dave
Re: sallary cap
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 7:09 pm
by thegimble
mike binder posted:
heard a little wisper that the rfl are getting a little worried because leeds and wigan are getting ready to challenge the rule in the courts as a restrant of buisness and the legalality of the rules just a little wisper dont kno any more
ITS ABOUT BLOODY TIME.
Why should we have to pay the same amount on wages when brining in a lot more money than the Wolves, Giants, Vikings, Centurions.
This should be challenged asap.
Re: sallary cap
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 7:13 pm
by thegimble
davewarrior posted:
:eusa4: lets not keep going on about the salary cap. The only thing wrong with it is the fact in the past our club has miss managed it
No whats wrong with it is that teams who are just about finacially viable can compete with teams who bring in more into the game.
Why should we be on the same level playing field as the Vikings.
We have bigger Attendances
We have bigger Revenue from Merchandise
Why should we pay the same as them on wages each year. That does not happen in any other sport in Europe. If its ok in your mind than how come the Broncos can bring in more foreigners than any one else. The cap is bent for some but for the clubs who still keep the game alive they get punished.
And by the way because of the cap and 20/20 ruling we could be relegated come September.
Re: sallary cap
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 7:51 pm
by mike binder
mike binder posted:
thegimble posted:
davewarrior posted:
:eusa4: lets not keep going on about the salary cap. The only thing wrong with it is the fact in the past our club has miss managed it
No whats wrong with it is that teams who are just about finacially viable can compete with teams who bring in more into the game.not only about sport its a buisnes thing how mant competing companies are restricted to how they can pay there staff just think the way things are going the european courts will kick it out as an illegal system
Why should we be on the same level playing field as the Vikings.
We have bigger Attendances
We have bigger Revenue from Merchandise
Why should we pay the same as them on wages each year. That does not happen in any other sport in Europe. If its ok in your mind than how come the Broncos can bring in more foreigners than any one else. The cap is bent for some but for the clubs who still keep the game alive they get punished.
And by the way because of the cap and 20/20 ruling we could be relegated come September.
the eoropean law will say it is an illegal system
Re: sallary cap
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 7:51 pm
by mike binder
mrs_carney posted:
from your good friend ian?
could be
Re: sallary cap
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 7:57 pm
by thegimble
mike binder posted:
mike binder posted:
thegimble posted:
No whats wrong with it is that teams who are just about finacially viable can compete with teams who bring in more into the game.not only about sport its a buisnes thing how mant competing companies are restricted to how they can pay there staff just think the way things are going the european courts will kick it out as an illegal system
Why should we be on the same level playing field as the Vikings.
We have bigger Attendances
We have bigger Revenue from Merchandise
Why should we pay the same as them on wages each year. That does not happen in any other sport in Europe. If its ok in your mind than how come the Broncos can bring in more foreigners than any one else. The cap is bent for some but for the clubs who still keep the game alive they get punished.
And by the way because of the cap and 20/20 ruling we could be relegated come September.
the eoropean law will say it is an illegal system
To be honest it want go that far. Any threat of legal action will see it dropped. Everyone knows its illegal and the governing body i do not think could afford to go further than the Lords here once ot goed to Europe then its going to cost millions more than likely.
We and the Rhinos only need to pull resources and take this on and i gurantee by next season it will be gone.
Re: sallary cap
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 8:00 pm
by mike binder

then lets start the ball rolling faster