A site for fans of Wigan Warriors RLFC. News, views, statistics, profiles and more all contributed by supporters of Wigan RL.
https://www.wiganwarriorsfans.com/
You're right about Budgie,something is amiss with the lad that blistering pace just doesnt seem to be there,or maybe he was always this speed and time is playing tricks on my mind,but he seems,for want of a better word,sluggish by the standards pre aussie.Wigan_forever1985 wrote:Marshall looks very uncomfortable on the right compared to how he did on the left. I personally would of stuck with what was working and played other players around rather. Budgie to the right wing for example for me (who hasn't looked half the player since his return)
I am afraid you have opened a can of worms here. My own pet hate is 'senile old man'. That is just like saying 'old old man'????Billgreenwoodsson wrote:I am intrigued. Why do so many people these days write "would of" when they clearly mean "would have". It is almost as annoying as when people say that something is "very unique" or "quite unique" ---- the very word unique means the only one of its kind; unlike anything else, so it is either unique or it isnt and cannot be quite or very unique. My apologies as this is clearly nothing at all to do with my beloved Wigan Rugby team!!!!!!
Billgreenwoodsson wrote: I am intrigued. Why do so many people these days write "would of" when they clearly mean "would have". It is almost as annoying as when people say that something is "very unique" or "quite unique" ---- the very word unique means the only one of its kind; unlike anything else, so it is either unique or it isnt and cannot be quite or very unique. My apologies as this is clearly nothing at all to do with my beloved Wigan Rugby team!!!!!!
Christ on a bike I thought I'd logged into an English grammar forum for a minute! Back into the important stuff, Davies for me over Marshall agree he's a better all round player but being young still makes defensive mistakes eg under the high ball like last week.Billgreenwoodsson wrote:I am intrigued. Why do so many people these days write "would of" when they clearly mean "would have". It is almost as annoying as when people say that something is "very unique" or "quite unique" ---- the very word unique means the only one of its kind; unlike anything else, so it is either unique or it isnt and cannot be quite or very unique. My apologies as this is clearly nothing at all to do with my beloved Wigan Rugby team!!!!!!