The thing about Holbrook he plays his strongest side no resting of players they just play it’s quite old fashioned in its way but something I like to seeNo straw damn us wrote:Yes, and baring Walmsley no injuries. It makes a dig difference.Barney841 wrote:I honestly do think with a new coach and a couple of signings we will be a different team next season.
Fresh ideas and a new enthusiasm are needed in this team.
Hate to say it but look at saints, look a different team with hollbrok arriving. They look like there really enjoying there rugby at the moment and have all the momentum
19-Man Squad: Vs Huddersfield
-
- Posts: 6494
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 10:54 am
Re: 19-Man Squad: Vs Huddersfield
Re: 19-Man Squad: Vs Huddersfield
I think NSDU point is that Sts have had the luxury of a seemingly fully fit squad. Lose a couple of key players to injury and they'd struggle.fozzieskem wrote:The thing about Holbrook he plays his strongest side no resting of players they just play it’s quite old fashioned in its way but something I like to seeNo straw damn us wrote:Yes, and baring Walmsley no injuries. It makes a dig difference.Barney841 wrote:I honestly do think with a new coach and a couple of signings we will be a different team next season.
Fresh ideas and a new enthusiasm are needed in this team.
Hate to say it but look at saints, look a different team with hollbrok arriving. They look like there really enjoying there rugby at the moment and have all the momentum
- wall_of_voodoo
- Posts: 1231
- Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 12:51 am
Re: 19-Man Squad: Vs Huddersfield
Sarginson, You MUST be kidding??!!!!No straw damn us wrote:Sarginson, Manfredi, Forsyth, Higginson, Burgess, Williams, Shorrocks, Sutton, Ganson, Wells, Farrell, Greenwood, Bateman.
Not a bad team that.
Manfredi, Been out almost 2 years, however Davies and Marshal have proven we have not missed him as much as most would think
Forsyth, Utter rubbish player. No pace for SL and no skills to make up for that with ball in hand
Higginson, who???!!!!
Burgess, Ditto Manfredi reply
Williams, Missed
Shorrocks, Crap at Salford and they sign a trouble maker from Aus to replace him
Sutton, Missed
Ganson, Wane doesn't think he is good enough defensively
Wells, Who???!!!!
Farrell, Missed
Greenwood, Plays like one game and he is "missed", like saying we are missing Ellery Hanley
Bateman. Biggest loss of the lot
Bet it would lose more games than it wonNot a bad team that.
I'm a better fan than you
Because I don't "Boo"!!!
Yes I bloody know transfer fees do not count on the salary cap for those illiterates that need it explaining to them because they assume everyone is as thick as they are
Because I don't "Boo"!!!
Yes I bloody know transfer fees do not count on the salary cap for those illiterates that need it explaining to them because they assume everyone is as thick as they are
- wall_of_voodoo
- Posts: 1231
- Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 12:51 am
Re: 19-Man Squad: Vs Huddersfield
I would say the issue is that the "switcheroo" is now seeing Escare play half back, a position he clearly looks uncomfortable in and doesn't play well in. Time to call an end to it and pick a half back to go into half back when we swap Tommy/PowellDaveO wrote:It's just stale. No different to last season. The one new "tactic", the "switcheroo" has gone stale because Escare is showing poor form.acwrlfc wrote:We need to accept we are poorly coached and players drop out with the slightest injury.
A new coach like at Saints drives them on with no connections, the sooner this clique and excuses goes the better, I think a complete new coaching staff is needed
I'm a better fan than you
Because I don't "Boo"!!!
Yes I bloody know transfer fees do not count on the salary cap for those illiterates that need it explaining to them because they assume everyone is as thick as they are
Because I don't "Boo"!!!
Yes I bloody know transfer fees do not count on the salary cap for those illiterates that need it explaining to them because they assume everyone is as thick as they are