So... will we beat Warrington?
Re: So... will we beat Warrington?
It's much more about the coach and the players than it is IFL.
-
- Posts: 1494
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:39 pm
Re: So... will we beat Warrington?
I can't see that. All I see is IFL cut costs last year, Wane resigned because he knew we were losing quality players and backroom staff. You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.
Whatever happened to Billy McGinty's pineapple?
Re: So... will we beat Warrington?
Did Wane tell you that? Be great to know the reason he actually gave was falseEast Stand Faithful wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2019 7:16 amI can't see that. All I see is IFL cut costs last year, Wane resigned because he knew we were losing quality players and backroom staff. You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.
These are two reasons not to trust people.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
-
- Posts: 2067
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 11:12 am
Re: So... will we beat Warrington?
We lost Sam Tomkins, replaced with Hardaker, Bateman replaced with Greenwood and Sutton replaced with Bullock.East Stand Faithful wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2019 7:16 amI can't see that. All I see is IFL cut costs last year, Wane resigned because he knew we were losing quality players and backroom staff. You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.
Bitcom went to Man City, we couldn't compete salary wise, Matty Peet went to Sale but has since returned, so the overall changes haven't been that big.
Wane left, which many on here wanted.
-
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 2:01 pm
Re: So... will we beat Warrington?
The vast majority of human conclusions on what is true or false are based on narrative rather than logic. Despite this, we all convince ourselves that we are logical.No straw damn us wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2019 8:15 amWe lost Sam Tomkins, replaced with Hardaker, Bateman replaced with Greenwood and Sutton replaced with Bullock.East Stand Faithful wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2019 7:16 amI can't see that. All I see is IFL cut costs last year, Wane resigned because he knew we were losing quality players and backroom staff. You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.
Bitcom went to Man City, we couldn't compete salary wise, Matty Peet went to Sale but has since returned, so the overall changes haven't been that big.
Wane left, which many on here wanted.
So, if I wanted Wane to stay, I see our current situation as proof that I was right - it fits my narrative.
Someone else thought Wane should go, so they find other reasons for our poor performance: Lam, players left, IFL etc.
Wigan Saints
Re: So... will we beat Warrington?
No but I'm always wrong
Re: So... will we beat Warrington?
With Sammut back in the side and Ratchford missing I think we will do them by 10
-
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 5:05 pm
Re: So... will we beat Warrington?
A few more injuries won't help but they're missing Ratchford which will. It will be interesting to compare the performance/score with the Challenge Cup game to see if Barcelona was a one off or the start of a dip in form.
Re: So... will we beat Warrington?
Bateman was never replaced. Greenwood was meant to replace him but in reality ended up replacing Joel Tomkins after the whole 'rectum of Wigan' incident.No straw damn us wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2019 8:15 amWe lost Sam Tomkins, replaced with Hardaker, Bateman replaced with Greenwood and Sutton replaced with Bullock.East Stand Faithful wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2019 7:16 amI can't see that. All I see is IFL cut costs last year, Wane resigned because he knew we were losing quality players and backroom staff. You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.
Bitcom went to Man City, we couldn't compete salary wise, Matty Peet went to Sale but has since returned, so the overall changes haven't been that big.
Wane left, which many on here wanted.