Yes the mighty leeds.... they are so forward thinking that they never just take other team cast offs....DaveO wrote: ↑Thu Jun 13, 2019 9:31 pm Leeds are obviously interested in a new half back and so have obviously considered Hastings but from the sound of it they aren’t prepared to sign a player who can leave when he feels like it.
For them to pass on Hastings for that reason tells you that whoever they do sign they expect them to honour their contract and are confident they can ensure that happens.
It says when faced with the prospect of having to agree to such a clause they would sooner look elsewhere which also says they have the ability to do so.
It says the exact opposite about IL and Rads. They will present it as the only way to get him here. That it is pragmatic and we can have a star we would otherwise not get.
What is really says is they have no idea how to go and find a half back who sees coming to Wigan as the destination, a place they want to be not because they want to go somewhere else and not a stepping stone to the NRL.
If this article is right the pair of them are quite simply useless. It’s one thing to lose players you developed when they get good but to be signing players you expect to lose is even worse.
It’s just more of the same rubbish we have seen already in that it positively encourages players to think they can leave. Leeds on the other hand want to sign players who are coming to see their deals out.
What happened to that hooker they brought in again? Did all that fuss about him breaking a contract do much in the end?
How did they end up with Myler again?