WiganWarriorsFans.com

Definitely not a winger.

If he was kicking last nite i would have understood his selection

Firestarter wrote: ↑Fri Jul 19, 2019 11:40 am If he was kicking last nite i would have understood his selection

Would make more sense to me to play Sarginson on the wing and Hank at Centre...

If Lam thinks Sarginson is our backup Fullback then his ability to catch under the high ball and field kicks isnt an obvious issue... Strange one to me.

Does it matter Ffs?

Wigan won,they all had a go on the wing,I was praying to see clubb have a spell out there but it was to be.

Was gonna say, I thought Sarge was playing on the wing, at least some of the time. Hank's no winger, but he's solid under the high ball, has good hands generally, and looks to be an excellent defender.

Don’t mean to slate hanks as I think he’s done ok for us but if we were to let him go, he would end up back in the championship.
He’s an average player at best and it’s worrying that we recruited him as back up.

moto748 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 19, 2019 12:58 pm Was gonna say, I thought Sarge was playing on the wing, at least some of the time. Hank's no winger, but he's solid under the high ball, has good hands generally, and looks to be an excellent defender.

That’s true but he has no pace and Wakefield exploited that with their kicking game.

Hank is a solid back up and can play in the backs and forwards, If you notice all our wingers defend 5 yards in from the touchline, especially Burgess who got caught out by Huddersfield and St Helens on more than one occasion.

Hankinson looks comfortable at centre. With a run of games he could do very well. His problem is his relative lack of pace but he does look a better ball handler than Sarge.