Page 3 of 13
Re: Bullock
Posted: Mon May 17, 2021 10:54 am
by Charriots Offiah
Barney841 wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 9:46 am
Bullock is our best prop and should start. Helps us get on the front foot.
Lam is getting it wrong unless he is carrying an injury….
Then why play him. We want him to be effective not a number making up the squad.
Re: Bullock
Posted: Mon May 17, 2021 11:05 am
by Mike
Charriots Offiah wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 10:54 am
Barney841 wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 9:46 am
Bullock is our best prop and should start. Helps us get on the front foot.
Lam is getting it wrong unless he is carrying an injury….
Then why play him. We want him to be effective not a number making up the squad.
Because he is being effective albeit in shorter spells than we'd like?
Re: Bullock
Posted: Mon May 17, 2021 2:10 pm
by Charriots Offiah
Mike wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 11:05 am
Charriots Offiah wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 10:54 am
Barney841 wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 9:46 am
Bullock is our best prop and should start. Helps us get on the front foot.
Lam is getting it wrong unless he is carrying an injury….
Then why play him. We want him to be effective not a number making up the squad.
Because he is being effective albeit in shorter spells than we'd like?
He can’t be effective in a five minute spell? Do you have any statistics to support that claim Mike? That puts extra pressure on the other forwards. Personally, I think don’t think that Lam rates his defence.
Re: Bullock
Posted: Mon May 17, 2021 2:37 pm
by Barney841
Charriots Offiah wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 10:54 am
Barney841 wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 9:46 am
Bullock is our best prop and should start. Helps us get on the front foot.
Lam is getting it wrong unless he is carrying an injury….
Then why play him. We want him to be effective not a number making up the squad.
Bullock is more effective for the time he’s on than most of our props who play most the game. That’s why
Re: Bullock
Posted: Mon May 17, 2021 5:26 pm
by moto748
w.thomas wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 8:24 am
I thought that I’d read somewhere than Ben kilner had left the club to pursue another career outside RL...or have I dreamt that!? I thought he looked like a brilliant prospect and has some size and natural aggression that our pack lacks.
You didn't imagine it, cos I remember that too!
Although whether it is correct, I have no idea. You would expect if he had left the Club, there would have been an official announcement.
Re: Bullock
Posted: Mon May 17, 2021 6:26 pm
by Firestarter
Well bullock is dropped or injured or even rested coz hes not playing tonight
Re: Bullock
Posted: Mon May 17, 2021 6:32 pm
by Ipinwigan
What the hell is Lam playing at, no Bullock in the team and Mitch Clark gets a bench position?
Mitch Clark couldn't break out of a wet paper bag.
It also looks like Hardaker is on the wing?
Re: Bullock
Posted: Mon May 17, 2021 7:28 pm
by Charriots Offiah
Barney841 wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 2:37 pm
Charriots Offiah wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 10:54 am
Barney841 wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 9:46 am
Bullock is our best prop and should start. Helps us get on the front foot.
Lam is getting it wrong unless he is carrying an injury….
Then why play him. We want him to be effective not a number making up the squad.
Bullock is more effective for the time he’s on than most of our props who play most the game. That’s why
Not defensively he isn’t.
Re: Bullock
Posted: Mon May 17, 2021 7:33 pm
by Barney841
Charriots Offiah wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 7:28 pm
Barney841 wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 2:37 pm
Charriots Offiah wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 10:54 am
Then why play him. We want him to be effective not a number making up the squad.
Bullock is more effective for the time he’s on than most of our props who play most the game. That’s why
Not defensively he isn’t.
French isn’t great under the high ball but he’s played for his attack.
Some players have weaknesses but if they help the team in other ways, the other players cover for them
Re: Bullock
Posted: Mon May 17, 2021 8:38 pm
by jaws1
Good break from Clarke to set up French try