Smiths 40/20 was good though.Firestarter wrote: ↑Thu Jun 24, 2021 8:08 pm Same old same old….. powell only goes alone on the try line and we havent learned that tommy cannot kick after all these years
Squad for Wakefield
Re: Squad for Wakefield
These are two reasons not to trust people.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
- Firestarter
- Posts: 5554
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:07 pm
Re: Squad for Wakefield
Yep i was gonna say that and then that happens…… powells knock on was unforgivable considering how much time he had thenCaboosegg wrote: ↑Thu Jun 24, 2021 8:10 pmSmiths 40/20 was good though.Firestarter wrote: ↑Thu Jun 24, 2021 8:08 pm Same old same old….. powell only goes alone on the try line and we havent learned that tommy cannot kick after all these years
IF YOU STRIKE ME DOWN I WILL BECOME MORE POWERFUL THAN YOU CAN POSSIBLY IMAGINE
- Firestarter
- Posts: 5554
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:07 pm
Re: Squad for Wakefield
Smith playing well….. havard definately running harder and pearce paul will definately be in the 17 every week for me
IF YOU STRIKE ME DOWN I WILL BECOME MORE POWERFUL THAN YOU CAN POSSIBLY IMAGINE
Re: Squad for Wakefield
I know we are Down on players but how bad must the coaches tactics be to have so much ball and convert it to so few points
We just don't look like we are going to get over their line when we are in there 20.
We just don't look like we are going to get over their line when we are in there 20.
These are two reasons not to trust people.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
Re: Squad for Wakefield
Well exactly the same as Hull KR
Plenty of effort, Plenty of territory, no ability to score
Opposition get tries of a break and a bit of luck.
Plenty of effort, Plenty of territory, no ability to score
Opposition get tries of a break and a bit of luck.
These are two reasons not to trust people.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
-
- Posts: 4252
- Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 1:14 pm
Re: Squad for Wakefield
When is Hanley going to go to fullback? Marshy looks like a duck out of water.
- Firestarter
- Posts: 5554
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:07 pm
Re: Squad for Wakefield
I think the problem on there line is very slow ball from powell and tommy tonight….. smith has been decent…… both mistakes from bibby cost us both tries
IF YOU STRIKE ME DOWN I WILL BECOME MORE POWERFUL THAN YOU CAN POSSIBLY IMAGINE
Re: Squad for Wakefield
Only Lam would put a fullback on the wing and a winger at fullback .Charriots Offiah wrote: ↑Thu Jun 24, 2021 8:35 pm When is Hanley going to go to fullback? Marshy looks like a duck out of water.
These are two reasons not to trust people.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
Re: Squad for Wakefield
That last one was not a mistake, the replay shows clear as day the Wakefield player pull the ball out.Firestarter wrote: ↑Thu Jun 24, 2021 8:36 pm I think the problem on there line is very slow ball from powell and tommy tonight….. smith has been decent…… both mistakes from bibby cost us both tries
These are two reasons not to trust people.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.