WiganWarriorsFans.com

Gerrumonside wrote: ↑Wed Jul 21, 2021 6:47 pm

pedro wrote: ↑Tue Jul 20, 2021 11:03 pm

bertina wrote: ↑Tue Jul 20, 2021 10:11 pm
To be honest I prefer Borouh.

not a chance, less from dummy half and his forward passes the other day sealed his fate in my eyes...poor rugby brain for me which I prefer for a hooker

ONeill looks like he could develop into a good 9 from what I’ve seen so far - bodes well for the future unless he heads to Canberra

yes he does, I was referring to Borough

Ian thornley 3 year contract. Guaranteed good source

Hope is better than his last 3 clubs who unloaded him like hot coals but we will wait and see, from what i have seen of him he is slow with no aggression .

cumbria_warrior wrote: ↑Sun Aug 15, 2021 5:52 pm Ian thornley 3 year contract. Guaranteed good source

Jesus if that’s correct we may as well fold the club now! 3yrs!

ddtftf wrote: ↑Sun Aug 15, 2021 8:23 pm Hope is better than his last 3 clubs who unloaded him like hot coals but we will wait and see, from what i have seen of him he is slow with no aggression .

Where do you get that from his Last 3 clubs was left hkr because relegated and could not afford to keep him went to Catalan played 2years for them never dropped from a good side went to leigh where he is top performer and outstanding against Wigan first game of this season running rings around our backs. And leigh pulled out all stops to keep him. You must have a different thornley to the one I know

w.thomas wrote: ↑Sun Aug 15, 2021 8:48 pm

cumbria_warrior wrote: ↑Sun Aug 15, 2021 5:52 pm Ian thornley 3 year contract. Guaranteed good source

Jesus if that’s correct we may as well fold the club now! 3yrs!

It is correct he signed weeks ago

Very reliable source

cumbria_warrior wrote: ↑Sun Aug 15, 2021 5:52 pm Ian thornley 3 year contract. Guaranteed good source

3 years! That's rather long. I would have thought 1 plus 1 in the clubs favour would be more appropriate. He must be dirt cheap.

Just a reminder to everyone who might not think Hank is worth a shout, not sure how many games played or how many tries he has set up for Miski but he is doing a great job

Goals
1. Chris Hankinson 62
2. Kieran Dixon 56
3. Craig Hall 53

Points
1. Craig Hall 178
2. Chris Hankinson 156

jackthelad wrote: ↑Mon Aug 16, 2021 8:25 am Just a reminder to everyone who might not think Hank is worth a shout, not sure how many games played or how many tries he has set up for Miski but he is doing a great job

Goals
1. Chris Hankinson 62
2. Kieran Dixon 56
3. Craig Hall 53

Points
1. Craig Hall 178
2. Chris Hankinson 156

In a lower division.