Agreed,good player but not a great one he may well kick on at Warrington who knows but not worth the sort of money they seem to have splashed out by wireNICKYKISS wrote: ↑Fri Sep 24, 2021 10:33 pmI think he makes a fair point, certainly from his time here. What big knock out games can you recall Williams dominating for us and coming up with big moments? I always felt he went missing somewhat in the biggest games.nathan_rugby wrote: ↑Fri Sep 24, 2021 10:19 pmWilliams is a flat track bully?
What on earth are you talking about.
You either don’t watch rugby or you watch it but don’t really know what’s going on.
Good player but not a great one for my money, simply because there’s a couple of glaring weaknesses and because he never really put a stamp on a big semi or final.
George Williams
-
- Posts: 6494
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 10:54 am
Re: George Williams
-
- Posts: 1830
- Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 10:25 pm
Re: George Williams
Pretty much anonymous tonight, shows the importance of go forward.
Re: George Williams
Sezer is the kind of half we needed.
Williams is a good player but not worth marquee money.
I’m not a fan of bringing former players back as past experiences have proved they don’t seem the same player but I would of had Williams back as I thought at the time he was the best half available
Williams is a good player but not worth marquee money.
I’m not a fan of bringing former players back as past experiences have proved they don’t seem the same player but I would of had Williams back as I thought at the time he was the best half available
-
- Posts: 4184
- Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 9:12 pm
Re: George Williams
I cannot believe we didn’t get Sezer and Chris Hill.Barney841 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 25, 2021 9:19 am Sezer is the kind of half we needed.
Williams is a good player but not worth marquee money.
I’m not a fan of bringing former players back as past experiences have proved they don’t seem the same player but I would of had Williams back as I thought at the time he was the best half available
Bomhead - "Lockers to prop."
-
- Posts: 6494
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 10:54 am
Re: George Williams
That we didn’t even seem to be in for either player is more worrying reels of lack of ambition by Wigannathan_rugby wrote: ↑Sat Sep 25, 2021 9:31 amI cannot believe we didn’t get Sezer and Chris Hill.Barney841 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 25, 2021 9:19 am Sezer is the kind of half we needed.
Williams is a good player but not worth marquee money.
I’m not a fan of bringing former players back as past experiences have proved they don’t seem the same player but I would of had Williams back as I thought at the time he was the best half available
Re: George Williams
Think Chris hill is abit past it now myself. Bit of a penalty machine as well, and we’ve got enough of them
-
- Posts: 6494
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 10:54 am
Re: George Williams
He’s been bang back in form this season once he got rid of the captaincy for a year or two he would have been a decent signing for my money given the inexperience tge props have age wise,but all by the by now
-
- Posts: 363
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:42 am
Re: George Williams
Exactly the kind of big go forward prop we need.