Page 1 of 3
u 18s final
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 9:38 pm
by mike binder
does any 1 know were they are playing the final at yet????????
Re: u 18s final
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 10:07 pm
by cpwigan
Almost as funny as the club / RFL losing home advantage for the lads.
Brawls happen Schalk at junior, academy, senior incl international level. Very often you get involved because you have to. You need to wake up and realise this is the real world. Hell, the most successful RL matches ever (State of Origin) were sold on violence
The U18's have a very big squad. They can cover the gaps and still win EVEN away from home
Re: u 18s final
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 10:31 pm
by cpwigan
Yep and they have had enough games by my reckoning.
Still is winning important at these levels or is there something far more important?
If they take care of Ratu or whatever he's called they'll be fine.
Re: u 18s final
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 10:32 pm
by My boyZ
Who are the 5 players which are suspended?
Re: u 18s final
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 10:34 pm
by cpwigan
Without knowing
TCoyle, McClorrum, Kavanagh, Stanton
Re: u 18s final
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 10:42 pm
by cpwigan
Schalk Brits... posted:
And?
If winning isn't important then why such a cry over where it's played?
Just playing Devils Advocate Schalk with a slightly serious point but hey I'm as shy person reluctant to offer my opinions
Home advantage may have just been more memorable for the young players. May be their only chance to play at the JJB. Then again it may have helped them to win. I never inferred what I was thinking :sly:
Re: u 18s final
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 10:45 pm
by My boyZ
D,HATTON
R.BRADLEY
N.STANTON
B.KAVANAGH
M.MCLLORUM, There the names posted on RLfans, just looked!
Re: u 18s final
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 10:52 pm
by cpwigan
They have enough players to covers those
BUT goota say
T.Coyle was his dad on the disciplinary panel. I mean come on, he was the first Wigan player in, the rest were simply backing him up and Thomas is a firey chap at best. Now Schalk the judiciary outcome is funny
BTW - The ref was a muppet
Re: u 18s final
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 11:09 pm
by cpwigan
I've no idea, I would guess they'll use the same number as they require to qualify for a medal under a normal league structure. The squad has been rotating though in the latter weeks. Sam Tomkins got more game time, Mossop seemed to be playing in order to ensure he'd played enough.
Re: u 18s final
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2005 2:25 pm
by GeoffN
My boyZ posted:
D,HATTON
R.BRADLEY
N.STANTON
B.KAVANAGH
M.MCLLORUM, There the names posted on RLfans, just looked!
Now confirmed on the club site...
http://www.wiganwarriors.com/news_full.asp?newsid=1574
Kavanagh 3 games, Bradley 1, the others 2 games.