Re: Partington
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2022 6:16 pm
It was only last year certain people were saying we were paying the price for bringing too many young forwards through at the same time:
Havard, Byrne, Partington, Smithies, Shorrocks.
Now it’s come down to getting rid of the oldest and probably 4th or 5th in pecking order on that list, people are saying to keep him?
Havard is already way better than Partington & Byrne has come on leaps and bounds this year.
There simply isn’t room nor the need for Partington imo.
Havard, Byrne, Partington, Smithies, Shorrocks.
Now it’s come down to getting rid of the oldest and probably 4th or 5th in pecking order on that list, people are saying to keep him?
Havard is already way better than Partington & Byrne has come on leaps and bounds this year.
There simply isn’t room nor the need for Partington imo.