WiganWarriorsFans.com

Have to agree with both above….. we have strengthened the centre positions( at last) and massively weakened the backrow….. 3 out none in doesnt fit

4 if you count oli partington as a back row/loose…… bet we wish we kept him now

Firestarter wrote: ↑Sat Jan 07, 2023 3:35 pm 4 if you count oli partington as a back row/loose…… bet we wish we kept him now

I would of rather had kept McDonnell and Nicholson, to see how they when this upcoming season

Barney841 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 07, 2023 7:51 pm

Firestarter wrote: ↑Sat Jan 07, 2023 3:35 pm 4 if you count oli partington as a back row/loose…… bet we wish we kept him now

I would of rather had kept McDonnell and Nicholson, to see how they when this upcoming season

Losing Nicholson was criminal.

Charriots Offiah wrote: ↑Sat Jan 07, 2023 8:20 pm

Barney841 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 07, 2023 7:51 pm

Firestarter wrote: ↑Sat Jan 07, 2023 3:35 pm 4 if you count oli partington as a back row/loose…… bet we wish we kept him now

I would of rather had kept McDonnell and Nicholson, to see how they when this upcoming season

Losing Nicholson was criminal.

Why?, If he was good enough we would of kept him regardless of what Bateman was or wasn't doing

medlocke wrote: ↑Sat Jan 07, 2023 8:24 pm

Charriots Offiah wrote: ↑Sat Jan 07, 2023 8:20 pm

Barney841 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 07, 2023 7:51 pm

I would of rather had kept McDonnell and Nicholson, to see how they when this upcoming season

Losing Nicholson was criminal.

Why?, If he was good enough we would of kept him regardless of what Bateman was or wasn't doing

Didn’t we offer him a new deal but the Wolves offered a better one?
I’m sure someone said that on here when he left

Barney841 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 07, 2023 9:18 pm

medlocke wrote: ↑Sat Jan 07, 2023 8:24 pm

Charriots Offiah wrote: ↑Sat Jan 07, 2023 8:20 pm

Losing Nicholson was criminal.

Why?, If he was good enough we would of kept him regardless of what Bateman was or wasn't doing

Didn’t we offer him a new deal but the Wolves offered a better one?
I’m sure someone said that on here when he left

Maybe so but if he was seen as being the future of the club surely we would have upped the offer

medlocke wrote: ↑Sat Jan 07, 2023 9:33 pm

Barney841 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 07, 2023 9:18 pm

medlocke wrote: ↑Sat Jan 07, 2023 8:24 pm
Why?, If he was good enough we would of kept him regardless of what Bateman was or wasn't doing

Didn’t we offer him a new deal but the Wolves offered a better one?
I’m sure someone said that on here when he left

Maybe so but if he was seen as being the future of the club surely we would have upped the offer

That he’s not here I’d suspect he wasn’t seen as the next messiah by the club it seems to me.

Barney841 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 07, 2023 7:51 pm

Firestarter wrote: ↑Sat Jan 07, 2023 3:35 pm 4 if you count oli partington as a back row/loose…… bet we wish we kept him now

I would of rather had kept McDonnell and Nicholson, to see how they when this upcoming season

I didnt see enough of mcdonnell and nicholson to rate them but we really seem to have messed up….. peat says hes happy with the squad but im betting hes not really

medlocke wrote: ↑Sat Jan 07, 2023 9:33 pm

Barney841 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 07, 2023 9:18 pm

medlocke wrote: ↑Sat Jan 07, 2023 8:24 pm
Why?, If he was good enough we would of kept him regardless of what Bateman was or wasn't doing

Didn’t we offer him a new deal but the Wolves offered a better one?
I’m sure someone said that on here when he left

Maybe so but if he was seen as being the future of the club surely we would have upped the offer

Depends on how much the salary cap we had left, maybe that’s why we had to let him go?
Remember we haven’t an unlimited pot like the Wolves