WiganWarriorsFans.com

Following the latest round of Betfred Super League, Betfred League One and Academy fixtures, the Match Review Panel have issued the following sanctions:

Paul Vaughan (Warrington Wolves) – Grade E Unnecessary contact – Refer to Tribunal
Thomas Mikaele (Warrington Wolves) – Grade B High Tackle - £250 Fine
Connor Wrench (Warrington Wolves) – Grade A Dangerous Contact – Not Applicable
Tommy Makinson (St Helens) – Grade B High Tackle - £250 Fine
Kaide Ellis (Wigan Warriors) – Grade A Dangerous Contact - £250 Fine
Jai Whitbread (Wakefield Trinity) – Grade C Dangerous Contact – 1 Match Penalty Notice
Kevin Proctor (Wakefield Trinity) – Grade C Dangerous Contact – 1 Match Penalty Notice
Kai O’Donnell (Leigh Leopards) – Grade B Dangerous Contact - £250 Fine
King Vuniyayawa (Salford Red Devils) – Grade C Other Contrary Behaviour – 2 Match Penalty Notice
Troy Richmond (Wigan Warriors Academy) – Grade B Trip - £25 Fine
Jack Horsfield (Hull FC Academy) – Grade C Dangerous Contact – 1 Match Penalty Notice

The following player was handed a caution:
Romain Navarette (Catalans Dragons) – Raises knee in tackle – N/A

Match Review Panel Minutes Monday 18 September 2023

https://www.rugby-league.com/article/62 ... view-panel

KPP has been cited v Castleford NFA

Harvie Hill NFA

Tyler Dupree NFA


What the heck have they got against Kaide Ellis?? It’s every bloody week

Tommy Makinson was cited 4 times, 3 high tackles & one late hit on the passer!

Holier than thou Saints players!!!

The vaughan ban is total horse

https://www.seriousaboutrl.com/paul-vau ... dia-82241/

The committee has now become a laughing stock in Australia.

https://www.seriousaboutrl.com/paul-vau ... dia-82241/

Surely there's going to come a point when players and club lawyers become involved in challenging the validity of these committees. There are no set penalties or clear guidelines to the grading. It depends who is on committee.
I'm at a loss as to say a grade B can carry 3 different outcomes for same offence . Dangerous contact regardless of how it happened. Surely these should be graded differently if deemed worse. Also players sighted 2/3 times in same game for same offences get n/a. With players getting same grading for 1 offence fines What's that about. Something has to give this comical pantomime of a committee are not fit for purpose and if someone doesn't look into the running of this money making machine. I think our game will only deteriorate even lower than we are

I’ve sent a tweet to the disciplinary saying they’re becoming farcical & a laughing stock!

Did you get a reply Josie, or have you now been cited for bringing the game into disrepute.....

Raging Penguin wrote: ↑Tue Sep 19, 2023 4:04 pm Did you get a reply Josie, or have you now been cited for bringing the game into disrepute.....

jobo wrote: ↑Tue Sep 19, 2023 4:55 pm

Raging Penguin wrote: ↑Tue Sep 19, 2023 4:04 pm Did you get a reply Josie, or have you now been cited for bringing the game into disrepute.....

Nah soft beggars.

You should have seen what I sent to Suella Braverman or whatever her name is! And like on here I use my real name