Page 1 of 7
Disciplinary
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2024 5:59 am
by josie andrews
Leigh Leopards & Wigan Warriors face nervy disciplinary wait
WHICH Super League stars face a nervy disciplinary wait following cards over the weekend?
Wigan Warriors 24-6 Leigh Leopards
Brad O’Neill – Wigan Warriors – high tackle – yellow card
Robbie Mulhern – Leigh Leopards – high tackle – yellow card
Salford Red Devils 22-20 Hull FC
Tom Briscoe – Hull FC – professional foul – yellow card
https://www.totalrl.com/counting-cards- ... nary-wait/
Re: Disciplinary
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2024 6:06 am
by Blackpool_Pie
If brad get a suspension we are properly screwed
Re: Disciplinary
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2024 8:18 am
by Firestarter
What high tackle?
Re: Disciplinary
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2024 9:27 am
by josie andrews
Firestarter wrote: ↑Mon Jul 08, 2024 8:18 am
What high tackle?
That’s what high thought! Dangerous tackle wasn’t it supposed to be?
And think the club have got to appeal if any ban is given!
Re: Disciplinary
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2024 10:04 am
by Wiganer Ted
The ref said Brad lifted him above the horizontal, perhaps that's what they mean? The phrase high tackle is perhaps not what should have been written.
Trouble is Brad didn't put in any part of the tackle that lifted his opponent. His legs partly went above the horizontal because of the power Brad put into the tackle. Both of Brad's arms were around the man's body. At no part did Brad's arms go into any lifting motion.
This is just from a newspaper article.
The judgement of the disciplinary will be interesting.
Re: Disciplinary
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2024 11:04 am
by Firestarter
He cant get a ban surely.Tackle of the season for me
Re: Disciplinary
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2024 11:30 am
by cherry toffee
Call me an old sceptic if you like but 4 points clear and a game in hand, I think they’ll find something
Re: Disciplinary
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2024 12:35 pm
by fozzie58
Wiganer Ted wrote: ↑Mon Jul 08, 2024 10:04 am
The ref said Brad lifted him above the horizontal, perhaps that's what they mean? The phrase high tackle is perhaps not what should have been written.
Trouble is Brad didn't put in any part of the tackle that lifted his opponent. His legs partly went above the horizontal because of the power Brad put into the tackle. Both of Brad's arms were around the man's body. At no part did Brad's arms go into any lifting motion.
This is just from a newspaper article.
The judgement of the disciplinary will be interesting.
Ah right is that what he got binned for well if that’s the case it was marginal from what was a big hit so for me in todays game a sin bin was probably the right call but nothing else for me at least.
Now watch him get a 10 game ban now I’ve said that
Re: Disciplinary
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2024 12:51 pm
by Caboosegg
fozzie58 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 08, 2024 12:35 pm
Wiganer Ted wrote: ↑Mon Jul 08, 2024 10:04 am
The ref said Brad lifted him above the horizontal, perhaps that's what they mean? The phrase high tackle is perhaps not what should have been written.
Trouble is Brad didn't put in any part of the tackle that lifted his opponent. His legs partly went above the horizontal because of the power Brad put into the tackle. Both of Brad's arms were around the man's body. At no part did Brad's arms go into any lifting motion.
This is just from a newspaper article.
The judgement of the disciplinary will be interesting.
Ah right is that what he got binned for well if that’s the case it was marginal from what was a big hit so for me in todays game a sin bin was probably the right call but nothing else for me at least.
Now watch him get a 10 game ban now I’ve said that
Did see anything wrong with it on the night. ONeil didn't lift him over the horizontal and controlled the tackle.
If someone flailing their legs in a tackle can class as turning it into a tip then we are in trouble as a game.
Re: Disciplinary
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2024 2:14 pm
by jobo
Looking back on the tackle in question, the Leigh player did land on the base of his neck/top of his shoulder.
Clearly no intent but it's 50/50 for me.