Page 1 of 4

Is the conspiracy genuine?

Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 10:02 pm
by cpwigan
Jesus Crest, a referee on the field of play can make a mistake, fair play but an ex referee watching several replays on TV. The damn ball was knocked out of his hands. How the hell can he knock on otherwise the ball was tucked into his chest. Ball stripped, loose ball grounded = try. Do these bastards want a SL without us.

Re: Is the conspiracy genuine?

Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 10:04 pm
by thegimble
cpwigan posted:
Jesus Crest, a referee on the field of play can make a mistake, fair play but an ex referee watching several replays on TV. The damn ball was knocked out of his hands. How the hell can he knock on otherwise the ball was tucked into his chest. Ball stripped, loose ball grounded = try. Do these bastards want a SL without us.
Seems that way. That was a bad call and if you ask me its just sent us down. Wakey were gone and were holding on.

FUC@@@@@ Cheats.

Re: Is the conspiracy genu...

Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 10:14 pm
by Refs `R Bent
well this is my 1st post and as my username implies, I agree with the comments the decison to give a knock on was a digrace, if this was football there'd be a major outcry about betting scandals (wonder what odds Presley had on his betting slip), makes u sick when one of the worst refs of all times Cummins is his boss but suppose they all learn hatred for wigan from early on. He should never sit as a 4th official ever again. Still 14 rounds to go I still expect em to stay up but it's about time Noble started weilding that big axe

Re: Is the conspiracy genu...

Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 10:14 pm
by oval balls
i am sitting here asolutely appalled at the standard of refereeing a game
even stevo said it was a try and it plainly showed the wakwey players hand on the ball and pulling down so therefore playon. richards grounded ball= TRY unless you are a st helens video ref with scummings in your ear saying no try :angry: :angry: :angry:

Re: Is the conspiracy genu...

Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 10:14 pm
by superleague
aye it was a bad decision and i agree that could be the decision that sends us down :angry: :(

Re: Is the conspiracy genu...

Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 10:15 pm
by Fujiman
thegimble posted:
cpwigan posted:
Jesus Crest, a referee on the field of play can make a mistake, fair play but an ex referee watching several replays on TV. The damn ball was knocked out of his hands. How the hell can he knock on otherwise the ball was tucked into his chest. Ball stripped, loose ball grounded = try. Do these bastards want a SL without us.
Seems that way. That was a bad call and if you ask me its just sent us down. Wakey were gone and were holding on.

FUC@@@@@ Cheats.
Yes it was a bad result BUT WE WERE NOT GOOD ENOUGH!!

Re: Is the conspiracy genu...

Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 10:18 pm
by thegimble
Fujiman posted:
thegimble posted:
cpwigan posted:
Jesus Crest, a referee on the field of play can make a mistake, fair play but an ex referee watching several replays on TV. The damn ball was knocked out of his hands. How the hell can he knock on otherwise the ball was tucked into his chest. Ball stripped, loose ball grounded = try. Do these bastards want a SL without us.
Seems that way. That was a bad call and if you ask me its just sent us down. Wakey were gone and were holding on.

FUC@@@@@ Cheats.
Yes it was a bad result BUT WE WERE NOT GOOD ENOUGH!!
How you work that out.

That was a Try. Wed have won .

Re: Is the conspiracy genu...

Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 10:21 pm
by cpwigan
This not good enough business is stupid. Good enough for what? Our only aim this season is not to finish bottom or next to bottom if Catalan are below us. That's all. We had a game won. Yes, we are not great but neither are Wakefield, neither are Castleford, neither are London, neither are Huddersfield. We need the points we earned and by god we earned that win.

Re: Is the conspiracy genu...

Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 10:22 pm
by Fujiman
thegimble posted:
Fujiman posted:
thegimble posted: Seems that way. That was a bad call and if you ask me its just sent us down. Wakey were gone and were holding on.

FUC@@@@@ Cheats.
Yes it was a bad result BUT WE WERE NOT GOOD ENOUGH!!
How you work that out.

That was a Try. Wed have won .
Youre grasping at straws Yes it should have been given but then again we shouldn't need to rely on a video ref to win If we were good enough, which we wern't, that would have just been to make the points diffrence better

Re: Is the conspiracy genu...

Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 10:23 pm
by turf
Steve Presley, is a waste of a video ref. That try for Richards that he wrongly disallowed will send us DOWN. He DESPERATELY needs his eyes testing.

Also, I thought Ganson was a joke tonight, as was most of our players ie, Moran, Dallas, Tickle etc, the list is endless isn't it.