Page 1 of 5

Video Ref

Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 10:58 am
by Jake
Once again we are being killed by the video ref, I bet Jerry Kershaw has got a Wakefield post code.

Re: Video Ref

Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 11:56 am
by GeoffN
Jake posted:
Once again we are being killed by the video ref, I bet Jerry Kershaw has got a Wakefield post code.
York, actually.

Mind you, it's far from the first time he's robbed us.
Fortunately, it didn't affect the result.

Re: Video Ref

Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 1:24 pm
by ancientnloyal
Just sen the match replay on SKY +... the first try was not 'benefit of the doubt'... no way... the second, WAS a penalty try... sadly. dobsons hand did come down but not deliberately...

2 points anyways

Re: Video Ref

Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 1:33 pm
by oldtimer
what is wrong with fans theses days?first we say all matches should have them, because the video can't lie but when it suits us they are wrong. ima they should ALL or none no half way :conf:

Re: Video Ref

Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 1:34 pm
by DaveO
ancientnloyal posted:
Just sen the match replay on SKY +... the first try was not 'benefit of the doubt'... no way... the second, WAS a penalty try... sadly. dobsons hand did come down but not deliberately...
If it was not deliberate it was not a penalty try otherwise we should have had one at Wakefield to win us the game.

What is more for a penalty try to be given you have to be fouled in the act of scoring a try. As the Quins player was short of the line that can't be the case. There was no way he was going over the line or reaching out to put the ball down.

If the video ref decided Dobson was deliberate in his action then given where the Quins player was it should simply have been a penalty, not a penalty try.

Over on rlfans I think it is pie eyed who has the scanner/refs call thing and his reporitng of what was said makes interesting reading. In a nutshell the ref and touch judges could not understand how he gave the decision which begs the question if the ref didn't think it was a try why go to the video ref in the first place?

Dave

Re: Video Ref

Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 7:13 pm
by #1 warrior princess
Kershaw was blind as a bat yesterday!

Re: Video Ref

Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 11:15 am
by Welski
The more I watch these video decisions the more I'm convinced the officials first thought is "what are the implications of my decision" rather than "what is the correct decision".


Re: Video Ref

Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 11:25 am
by Dawber
Both = no try, Simple as that, The sad part about it is if come the end of the season and it comes down to points difference? Well need i say more.

Re: Video Ref

Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 12:51 pm
by GeoffN
Even Tony Rea admits they should never have been given.
"Even Quins coach Tony Rea was shaking his head.

"I can't believe it. I don't know where they get these calls from
."

from:
http://www.wigantoday.net/ViewArticle2. ... ID=1603591

Re: Video Ref

Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 1:42 pm
by Steph
We watched the replay yesterday. When they scored them tries (that wre not tries) stevo said for the first try the video ref will give a benifit of the doubt and next minute on the big screen it came up as benifit of the doubt, same again for the plenty try.