Gasnier stays in Aus
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2003 12:50 pm
From www.sporting-life.com/rugbyleague/news, Maurice Lindsey has stated he is no longer interested in signing Mark Gasnier:-
"There have been so many wildly-exaggerated reports connecting us with Mark Gasnier that we felt it necessary to publicly announce that, as much as we admire Mark, we will not be pursuing our interest.
"There have been reports both in this country and Australia suggesting that we were about to pay a king's ransom when in reality any interest we have shown has been within salary cap restrictions and considerably less than the outrageous sums stated by certain people.
"Perhaps suggesting that Wigan were prepared to pay a high sum helped to improve negotiations in Australia. We will not be part of that game. It is not the first time that we have been mentioned in this way by a particular agent in Australia."
I sense a couple of little digs here: first off the fact that certain players' agents seem to use our club as a bargaining tool for their players to try and boost wages, which is perhaps why we get linked with all-and-sundry whenever a player gets close to ending their contract - perhaps people need to be a bit more cautious whenever a name gets linked to Wigan in future? Also mention of the salary cap reminds me of a column in last weekend's Daily Star on Sunday where a certian Gary Schofield opened his rather big mouth (for a change) and questioned how a team like Wigan can afford to buy such expensive players such as Danny Orr and others despite the salary cap. Schofield sounds like a broken record sometimes, but it is perhaps a timely reminder to the rest of the league that we're at least trying to conform to the restrictions.
"There have been so many wildly-exaggerated reports connecting us with Mark Gasnier that we felt it necessary to publicly announce that, as much as we admire Mark, we will not be pursuing our interest.
"There have been reports both in this country and Australia suggesting that we were about to pay a king's ransom when in reality any interest we have shown has been within salary cap restrictions and considerably less than the outrageous sums stated by certain people.
"Perhaps suggesting that Wigan were prepared to pay a high sum helped to improve negotiations in Australia. We will not be part of that game. It is not the first time that we have been mentioned in this way by a particular agent in Australia."
I sense a couple of little digs here: first off the fact that certain players' agents seem to use our club as a bargaining tool for their players to try and boost wages, which is perhaps why we get linked with all-and-sundry whenever a player gets close to ending their contract - perhaps people need to be a bit more cautious whenever a name gets linked to Wigan in future? Also mention of the salary cap reminds me of a column in last weekend's Daily Star on Sunday where a certian Gary Schofield opened his rather big mouth (for a change) and questioned how a team like Wigan can afford to buy such expensive players such as Danny Orr and others despite the salary cap. Schofield sounds like a broken record sometimes, but it is perhaps a timely reminder to the rest of the league that we're at least trying to conform to the restrictions.