Flanagan Confirmed

[Wigan_forever1985]

Signed a 2 year deal on the WW website now

[bertina]

Nobby`s Girl posted:
So does this mean that the squad numbers will be announced now?

Anybody got any ideas as what this young guy is like? I`m not very clued up on him :conf:

It says on the WW website that he`s a stand off.. isnt this Lu Lu`s position :conf:

Can someone inform me of the plan please.

Lu Lu's position is scrum half.
Trent Barrett's position is stand off.
He will have been signed as cover for both half back positions as we are pretty short on cover there.

[Fraggle]

bertina posted:

Nobby`s Girl posted:
So does this mean that the squad numbers will be announced now?

Anybody got any ideas as what this young guy is like? I`m not very clued up on him :conf:

It says on the WW website that he`s a stand off.. isnt this Lu Lu`s position :conf:

Can someone inform me of the plan please.

Lu Lu's position is scrum half.
Trent Barrett's position is stand off.
He will have been signed as cover for both half back positions as we are pretty short on cover there.

Also, at 18, Flanagan isn't going to be ready to be first choice for the club. The BBC story quotes Noble as saying "He is only a young man and will be looking to work his way through from our under-21 squad."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 230783.stm

[waterside glens]

makes a change from other clubs nicking our young talent , good on ya nobby

[wigan/pier]

This is worrying (if true) it says on the rlfans site.."But Wigan are an exciting club and they see me more as a second-row/loose forward, which is where I want to play, not at stand-off like at Bradford "...just what we need another second row forward :conf:

[tom g]

Just get burgess now and we will be sorted

[medlocke]

He could maybe show Lockers how the game should really be played


Seriously though, if Lockes has some competition for his place, it might shove a rocket up his rear and make him play like he should be playing :sly:

[medlocke]

wgnwrs posted:

medlocke posted:
He could maybe show Lockers how the game should really be played


Seriously though, if Lockes has some competition for his place, it might shove a rocket up his rear and make him play like he should be playing :sly:

Is your every post about Lockers? Are you juts looking to cause argument and debate? Everything you say mentions Lockers, it's ridiculous.

in my last 20 odd posts i have only mentioned the great one a couple of times, i am not obsessed, just concerned

[jinkin jimmy]

medlocke posted:

wgnwrs posted:

medlocke posted:
He could maybe show Lockers how the game should really be played


Seriously though, if Lockes has some competition for his place, it might shove a rocket up his rear and make him play like he should be playing :sly:

Is your every post about Lockers? Are you juts looking to cause argument and debate? Everything you say mentions Lockers, it's ridiculous.

in my last 20 odd posts i have only mentioned the great one a couple of times, i am not obsessed, just totally 100% wrong.

Typo corrected. :eusa17:

[medlocke]

jinkin jimmy posted:

medlocke posted:

wgnwrs posted: Is your every post about Lockers? Are you juts looking to cause argument and debate? Everything you say mentions Lockers, it's ridiculous.

in my last 20 odd posts i have only mentioned the great one a couple of times, i am not obsessed, just totally 100% wrong.

Typo corrected. :eusa17:

So if i am 100% wrong, The Holy one must be playing to the best of his ability's, if that is so, then he wants sacking :sly: