Which is worse?

[cpwigan]

Racially abusing someone or sexually assaulting them twice?

[fitzy]

probably the second one just edge's it as it could have done the lad's chance of having a family alot slimmer however racial abuse is very serious and should not be tolerated

[GeoffN]

cpwigan posted:
Racially abusing someone or sexually assaulting them twice?

Well, I know which I'd prefer!

(depending on who was doing the assaulting, perhaps...? )

I can understand the RFL wanting to stamp out racism, quite rightly, but 6 games seems a bit harsh compared to Price's 3.

[cpwigan]

Firstly let me say, racism is obviously not acceptable. However, in sport sledging is common place and you say things you would never say off the field of play. Spitting and grabbing somebodys genitals are even unwritten no nos on the field of play.

The RFL are an absolute joke.

[FROM A TO B]

I suppose it depends who you played for.
If Stains, then you can do no wrong

[damien morrissey]

FROM A TO B posted:
I suppose it depends who you played for.
If Stains, then you can do no wrong

Its funny how the RFL take the hard line once the whole silly misunderstanding was cleared up between the nice saint helens man.

How many times!!!

[Geraldine_Papadopoulos]

I think Daniel Anderson is the judge of all these incidents... Leon Pryce virtually rapes someone on the field of play, twice.... 3 match ban, coinsidentally he can play in the challenge cup final.... Kieron Cunningham's "bicep" (as stevo says) on pat richards only gained hima fine didn't it? Or was it a 1 match ban? Well it was something sh*t like that

[cpwigan]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 935969.stm

No Saints players this week and the length of the suspensions suddenly increases

[Matthew]

The suspensions for non-stains players has been pretty consistent all season!

[Matthew]

Banning players from Leeds AND Bradford - that should ensure stains win the league leaders shield!