53 tackles
53 tackles
Wigan had to make just 53 tackles tonight
Re: 53 tackles
One sided game Hull poor or we made them look that way ?
or Noble gave them a bung
or Noble gave them a bung

-
- Posts: 5416
- Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:38 pm
Re: 53 tackles
Meant Wigan were not "stretched" defensively.mickw wrote:so what.cpwigan wrote:Wigan had to make just 53 tackles tonight
On the "flip side" it gave Wigan ample opportunity to practise moves.
[img]http://www.webdeveloper.com/animations/ ... monkey.gif[/img]
The biggest Room is the Room for improvement.
The best form of defence is attack!!
Out of the black and into the red, remember you don't get anything for two in a bed!!
The biggest Room is the Room for improvement.
The best form of defence is attack!!
Out of the black and into the red, remember you don't get anything for two in a bed!!
Re: 53 tackles
What sort of comment is that?mickw wrote:so what.cpwigan wrote:Wigan had to make just 53 tackles tonight
I find it astounding that a team has to make only 53 tackles in a game. Considering in some games 1 player can make around 40 tackles.
-
- Posts: 2815
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 6:13 pm
Re: 53 tackles
hull fc were a joke.
Ok the players dont want any sort of knock before Wembley but last night was just pathetic!
Ok the players dont want any sort of knock before Wembley but last night was just pathetic!
Owen Coyles Super White Army!!!
Re: 53 tackles
I think any team could have played hull fc tonight and not had many tackes to make, but I thought Wigan where out standing, up in the faces right from K/O and forcing errors.
-
- Posts: 14533
- Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 10:33 pm
- Location: Howe Bridge
- Contact:
Re: 53 tackles
Although Hull, for obvious reasons, have Wembley on their minds it was a great performance against a profesisonal Hull outfit. Surprised to hear it was 53... at least 5 (10%) forced the opponents a few metres back in drives.
66 - 6
with our attacking, maybe 3 potential tries/ disallowed could have got close to the 80 mark.
66 - 6
with our attacking, maybe 3 potential tries/ disallowed could have got close to the 80 mark.
https://www.ancientandloyal.com/
Now on Bluesky Social Media posting regularly pre-War snippets
https://bsky.app/profile/ancientandloyal.com
Now on Bluesky Social Media posting regularly pre-War snippets
https://bsky.app/profile/ancientandloyal.com
-
- Posts: 6134
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:24 pm
Re: 53 tackles
It was a performance against a professional Superleague team who played like conference team amateurs.
I am not taking much out of this game, solely because of the way Hull FC under performed.
I am not taking much out of this game, solely because of the way Hull FC under performed.
Re: 53 tackles
We also only dropped the ball once, and that was when Joel Tomkins lost it when he had a try disallowed. Well done lads! :thum:
Wigan Till I Die!!
We've had Barrett and Kenny, Edwards and Hanley, Boston and 8 IN A ROW!!!
We've had Barrett and Kenny, Edwards and Hanley, Boston and 8 IN A ROW!!!
-
- Posts: 11308
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:31 pm
Re: 53 tackles
I am with you on this one. Rather than dwell on how well we played against Hull, I would rather know the reasons why we played so badly against Huddersfield, and get some reassurance that they have been addressed to everyone's satisfaction!Panchitta Marra wrote:It was a performance against a professional Superleague team who played like conference team amateurs.
I am not taking much out of this game, solely because of the way Hull FC under performed.