The Colbon Try

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

The Colbon Try

Post by cpwigan »

Having seen it now I do not see how the decision to award no try and a knock on scrum feed to Cats was even awarded. For those who have not seen it.

Tommy puts a grubber in and then the Cats player knocks on, it is a technical knock on because the ball then hits Colbon in the upper leg / knee area. If you then rule that the ball touches a Cats player before Colbon regathers to score the worst result should be double knock on, scrum feed to Wigan.

As it stands it seems nigh impossible to say if the ball touched a Cats player before Colbon regathers and scored. He definetly touched down. On that basis a benefit of the doubt try should have been awarded.

This is not down to Ganson BTW, video referee decision.

jackoh
Posts: 438
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 12:55 pm

Re: The Colbon Try

Post by jackoh »

I agree looked at it several times and seen nothing wrong with it , after saying that I saw nothing wrong in the Bosc try which was disallowed , perhaps the video ref was evening up his wrong decisions up
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: The Colbon Try

Post by cpwigan »

I agree re the Bosch try

I thought the nearly try when Mathers dropped the bomb should have been a penalty for not contesting the ball whilst a player was in theair.
ancientnloyal
Posts: 14533
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 10:33 pm
Location: Howe Bridge
Contact:

Re: The Colbon Try

Post by ancientnloyal »

its a stupid decision, farce!
https://www.ancientandloyal.com/

Now on Bluesky Social Media posting regularly pre-War snippets
https://bsky.app/profile/ancientandloyal.com
User avatar
Wigan_forever1985
Posts: 6673
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 9:50 pm

Re: The Colbon Try

Post by Wigan_forever1985 »

right heres a question.

What is a technical knock on?

I know the rule states that if you loose the ball going forard and it hits an opposing player its deemed a knock-on

Now cast your mind back a while semi-tadulala scored a try for bradford where he jumped to catch a high ball it bounced off him went forward but he regathered before it hit either the floor or a player and was deemed an ok try.

So heres the question.

If you can loose the ball forward but as long as you regather its not a knock on whats to stop you throwing the ball forward over the defensive line and regathering before it hits the floor? like an up and under but it would obviously be a lot easier to control or would this be deemed a forward pass to yourself? and can such an infringment be given?
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: The Colbon Try

Post by cpwigan »

Wigan_forever19 85 wrote:right heres a question.

What is a technical knock on?

I know the rule states that if you loose the ball going forard and it hits an opposing player its deemed a knock-on

Now cast your mind back a while semi-tadulala scored a try for bradford where he jumped to catch a high ball it bounced off him went forward but he regathered before it hit either the floor or a player and was deemed an ok try.

So heres the question.

If you can loose the ball forward but as long as you regather its not a knock on whats to stop you throwing the ball forward over the defensive line and regathering before it hits the floor? like an up and under but it would obviously be a lot easier to control or would this be deemed a forward pass to yourself? and can such an infringment be given?
What is a technical knock on?
I know the rule states that if you lose the ball going forward and it hits an opposing player its deemed a knock-on
= technical knock on with the ball not having to hit the ground.

You are not allowed to deliberately propell the ball forward and regather it. Decades ago, a player used to run at the defence throw the ball over them and regather it on the other side and break away. Hence, they brought the rule in. You are allowed to juggle the ball in the act of trying to catch it BUT :) here is the grey area.

You cannot juggle it deliberately and thus it is open to interpretation.

Another irk IMO is when a player passes the ball so badly that his teammate cannot catch it so he sticks his boot out and the ball plays him and goes forward. This is play on but it annoys me as you gain an advantage from poor play.
Matthew
Posts: 3273
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 2:40 pm
Contact:

Re: The Colbon Try

Post by Matthew »

Thought it was a shocking decision!

Who was the video ref? Mick Potter?!?!!

At least Dick Turpin wore a mask!
"And Martin Offiah, trying to make some space, now then..." - Ray French, Wembley 1994
------------------------------------------------
Interviewer: So that obviously means that you're not going to St Helens and you're not going to Leeds?

Frano: I don't know why I would ever want to go to St Helens or Leeds
------------------------------------------------
turf
Posts: 5539
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:53 pm

Re: The Colbon Try

Post by turf »

Matthew wrote:Thought it was a shocking decision!

Who was the video ref? Mick Potter?!?!!

At least Dick Turpin wore a mask!
Might as well have been after that decision to wipe out the Colbon try!!!! :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry:

I think it was Gerry Kershaw.
GeoffN
Posts: 12559
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 1:40 pm

Re: The Colbon Try

Post by GeoffN »

turf wrote:
Matthew wrote:Thought it was a shocking decision!

Who was the video ref? Mick Potter?!?!!

At least Dick Turpin wore a mask!
Might as well have been after that decision to wipe out the Colbon try!!!! :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry:

I think it was Gerry Kershaw.
What makes you think that, turf? I'm interested as there isn't a VR listed on the RFL appointments page.

EDIT: Oh, OK, I've just read the other thread.
User avatar
jaws1
Posts: 3211
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 2:43 pm
Contact:

Re: The Colbon Try

Post by jaws1 »

The ironical thing is that if there had been no video ref both Bosc's try and Colbon would have been ok.
Post Reply