All appointments are based solely on form, and in the same way that a coach picks his best line-up for a final, I have to do the same and on current form Steve Ganson is the right man for the job.â€
ganson wont get the grand final.the rfl have told ganson from day 1 he will get a final this year whther sts get there are not ,this is another reason why they have put the home rules refs in .they feel ganson was un fairly treated because of sts success.
now personaly i think thye have to the easy option as i think the cc final is a none match any way sts will win with at least 40 pts and hull should of been kicked out for breaking the rules any way ,in any other sport other than rugby they would.even in the wigan pool league if you play a illegable player you lose ypour pts you won are you get kicked out of the cup.
i know its a little far feached but imagine if the rfl didnt give ganson the cc final and we made it to the final of the GF against sts and the rfl gave ganson that one imagine the up roar.
so for once i have to agree with ganson getting this but it looks like the clown will now get the GF
If the rules have been changed to accommodate Ganson it's a farce. How many cup finals did John McDonald and the Connolly brothers miss out on when we were winning everything in sight?
I'd sooner take my chances with an incompetent neutral ref than an openly bias homer any day.
All appointments are based solely on form, and in the same way that a coach picks his best line-up for a final, I have to do the same and on current form Steve Ganson is the right man for the job.â€
Surprised emoticons
So the stains do not need to turn up then what with these two bent b*****ds in charge.Call me a cynic or call me a cynic.Wonder who the player will be that gets sent off for hull?
What a Joke!!! putting those two incompetent morons in charge. Further strengthens my opinion that those pricks at the RFL are a load of idiots. If somebody does not get a grip of these so called refs they are going to make the game a laughing stock if not already. It looks like a fix up to everybody. It makes the game look no better than WWF wrestling. HOW CAN ANYBODY TAKE THE GAME SERIOUSLY
"A STRONG LEEDS IS GOOD FOR THE GAME" (Gratian, H 2006)
sheepdip wrote:It looks like a fix up to everybody. It makes the game look no better than WWF wrestling. HOW CAN ANYBODY TAKE THE GAME SERIOUSLY
Unfortunately, if the game is covered in controversy, the game will become a laughing stock for this.
A side that should have been "thrown out" for breaking the deadline rules, versus a side, who the referee is well known to support, by virtually every RL fan in the country. Will not cover the game with credit, dignity or honour. These things I doubt the likes of Wood and company could even spell, never mind excise, and do a great dishonour to all the great memories, CC finals and officials from the games past.
Hate to say it,but it just goes to show how predictable our great game is.Cummings was obviously too much of a coward to prove is other point and appoint Smith as video ref.
