I know Stu got smashed by the aussies but he is older wiser and more experienced now so i doubt that would happen again. I agree the wales game cant be counted as a proper test but i think our pack would be a lot 'stiffer' if we had fielden in it instead of wilkin(who has a lot greater chance of getting smashed by the aussies and for me isn't big enough or strong enough to even be of notice to the aussies) and i also stil had mary on the bench as even though he hasn't been playing his best recently we would still need him against the aussies, yes ther are quite a few big hits in the nrl but most of them guys in that pack can give and take a big hit, finally scotland ??? mite aswell say accrington stanley for the champions leaguehighland convert wrote:Would you not consider Smith would take into account previous internationals. Fielden got thumped by the ausies. Gleeson wasnt't at the races. On past performances both should be in doubt. The walws game proved nothing as the skill factor was too great a gulf. As stated Fielden would not have broken through the oz team so easily. Confidence booster but if they play like that over there medivac insurance better be good. People here have been griping on our pack is not stff enough but you are suggesting Fielden as a main prop. Mary attracts players and stands his ground. That is what is needed. I watched NRL some of the hits were massive. Superleague has few big enforcers from uk stock. Better to keep our lads whole for next season.
Come on Scotland,
Jim
Stuart Fielden
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Stuart Fielden
-
- Posts: 277
- Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 10:03 am
Re: Stuart Fielden
Correct plus throw in the fact that morley is still struggling with a stomach muscle strain, seems really stupid to leave fielden at home!DaveO wrote:Isn't Smith only taking four props and eight back row in his 24 man squad?
If so that's a risk and as good a reason as any to take Fielden. Five props and seven back row forwards for a touring side seems much better to me.
Dave
GEER EM ONSIDE
-
- Posts: 1949
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 9:36 am
Re: Stuart Fielden
For years now we have had the biff to compete against the Aussies. Its the lack of talent behind the pack that has consistently let the side down.viva_seddo13 wrote:Peacock has been used at second row for GB in the past and i think if we want to beat the aussies we'll have to do it in the forwards
Re: Stuart Fielden
So has Morley and Fielden and graham and Maurie have for Saintsviva_seddo13 wrote:Peacock has been used at second row for GB in the past and i think if we want to beat the aussies we'll have to do it in the forwards
- viva_seddo13
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 7:54 pm
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Stuart Fielden
I've seen ginge but never mary :doz:viva_seddo13 wrote:Never seen graham or mauire play Second row :conf:
- wall_of_voodoo
- Posts: 1231
- Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 12:51 am
Re: Stuart Fielden
Laughed at the tangible correctness of this post. More to the point, how has rob purdham got in? (for he is ten times worse).markill wrote:very good point. It shouldn't be seen as 'maurie vs fielden', it should be seen 'why is langley in there at all!? shouldn't maurie and stu both be going instead of him'
I'm a better fan than you
Because I don't "Boo"!!!
Yes I bloody know transfer fees do not count on the salary cap for those illiterates that need it explaining to them because they assume everyone is as thick as they are
Because I don't "Boo"!!!
Yes I bloody know transfer fees do not count on the salary cap for those illiterates that need it explaining to them because they assume everyone is as thick as they are
